Skip to content
Review

Classification performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aug 2026 · Rheumatology · Vol 65 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria exhibit consistently excellent specificity but reduced and phenotype-dependent sensitivity, which reinforces the intended role of the criteria for classification rather than clinical diagnosis and highlight important limitations in specific APS subgroups.

Abstract

Objectives

To systematically evaluate the classification performance of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of literature from August 2023 through May 2026, including studies that evaluated the ability of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria to classify patients previously classified according to expert clinical diagnosis and/or the 2006 revised Sapporo (Sydney) criteria. Data on true and false positives and negatives were extracted. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model when both parameters were available; sensitivity was additionally pooled using a univariate random-effects model.

Results

Twenty four studies comprising 25 data sets were included, of which 13 incorporated non-APS control groups. In the bivariate meta-analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.74 (95%CI 0.67-0.81) and pooled specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00). Sensitivity demonstrated substantial heterogeneity across studies and varied markedly by APS phenotype. Sensitivity was low in obstetric APS (pooled sensitivity 0.20 in studies restricted to obstetric APS and 0.31 when obstetric subgroup data from additional studies were included), whereas it was higher among cases of thrombotic APS (0.82). Across cohorts, non-classification was mainly driven by isolated IgM antiphospholipid antibody positivity and obstetric APS phenotypes.

Conclusion

The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria exhibit consistently excellent specificity but reduced and phenotype-dependent sensitivity. These findings reinforce the intended role of the criteria for classification rather than clinical diagnosis and highlight important limitations in specific APS subgroups.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Reclassification of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome under the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria: risk of under-recognition in patients with non-criteria antibodies and clinical implications

Findings support using the 2023 criteria primarily to define homogeneous research cohorts rather than as a stand-alone basis for diagnosis or treatment decisions, and support using the 2023 criteria primarily to define homogeneous research cohorts.

Ting-Wei Sheng, Yu-Qi Tang, Zheng-Wei Tan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of performance of the Sapporo criteria, the Revised Sapporo criteria, and the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A protocol

Background Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent thrombotic events and/or adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although three classification criteria—the 1999 Sapporo criteria, the Revised Sapporo criteria, and the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification—have been develop...

Jie Wang, Yang-Qi Yin, Jia-Qi Qu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Performance of lupus classification criteria in monogenic lupus: a national multicenter cohort study.

One-third of genetically confirmed monogenic lupus patients remained unclassified, particularly those with interferon-related and nucleic acid metabolism defects, highlighting pathway-dependent limitations of current classification criteria.

Nergis Akay, S. Şahin, S. A. Uçar et al. · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Revisiting Pediatric ITP Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Simple Clinical and Laboratory Predictors of Chronic Disease.

BACKGROUND Pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) usually has a favorable prognosis, although some children progress to chronic disease (>12 mo). A 2014 meta-analysis by Heitink-Pollé and colleagues identified important prognostic markers that informed tools such as the Nordic prediction score. Given advances in diagn...

Ahmad S. Ashi, O. Alshaikhi, E. Alnasser · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Takotsubo Syndrome Using the InterTAK Criteria: Insights from Inter- TAK-Defined Patients (A Systematic Review).

INTRODUCTION To synthesize contemporary evidence on epidemiology, triggers and risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management patterns, and outcomes in Takotsubo Syndrome (TTS) restricted to studies using the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Diagnostic Criteria. METHODS A PRISMA‑guided...

Matthias Dullaert, Fee Van Langenhove, Said Hachimi-Idrissi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.