The results suggest that dynamic conflict clustering, combined with lightweight strategic and learning-guided repair, improves both communication efficiency and robustness in incomplete DCSP solving.
Abstract
Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems (DCSPs) model distributed decision-making in multi-agent systems, where agents assign values to local variables while satisfying shared constraints. However, many DCSP solvers still rely on broad, repeated peer-to-peer communication and are largely reactive, with limited support for strategic coordination or learning. This increases communication overhead, can lead to stagnation, and reduces the success of hard instances. Hence, we propose Dynamic Conflict Clustering-Incomplete (DCC-Incomplete), a repair-based solver that combines conflict-centred decomposition, structured coordination, strategic repair, and lightweight learning for stagnation recovery. DCC-Incomplete groups the unsolved part of the problem into conflict clusters and restricts communication via a coordination layer to agents within the same conflict region. It also introduces memory-guided restart, enabling agents and clusters to pause, revise, and adapt repairs based on neighbouring conflict states. A thorough evaluation of DCC-Incomplete on distributed graph-colouring benchmarks with planted satisfying assignments shows that its memory-guided restart improves the success rate from 37.50% to 61.11%, reduces median runtime from 0.565s to 0.367s, and cuts median communication from 12.493 to 6.503 messages per constraint. These results suggest that dynamic conflict clustering, combined with lightweight strategic and learning-guided repair, improves both communication efficiency and robustness in incomplete DCSP solving.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...
Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al.· arXiv.org· 121 citations· ⚡9
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...