Skip to content

Harnessing VLM in Embodied RL: From Reward Regressor to Success Detector via Exploration-Augmented Key-Observation Gating

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 27 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The proposed exploration-augmented key-observation gating first determines whether the current RL episode is judgment-worthy based on its similarity to a generated success trajectory, and proposes VLM success reward via Exploration-Augmented Key-Observation Gating (VLMeg) to well harness VLM for embodied reward design.

Abstract

VLMs provide promising solutions to embodied reward design. Most current methods that train VLMs as reward regressors not only require extensive annotations but are also primarily designed for finetuning pretrained policies, and perform less well in the more challenging from-scratch RL setting. This issue stems from a fundamental mismatch: regressing precise rewards is misaligned with what VLMs naturally excel at. We posit that it is more aligned with VLMs'inherent multi-modal VQA capabilities for the models to function as success detectors, and propose VLM success reward via Exploration-Augmented Key-Observation Gating (VLMeg) to well harness VLM for embodied reward design. As the core of VLMeg, the proposed exploration-augmented key-observation gating first determines whether the current RL episode is judgment-worthy based on its similarity to a generated success trajectory. Then, the key observation with the lowest confusion from the judgment-worthy episode will be selected for VLM evaluation as episodic reward. This gating mechanism not only avoids redundant calls but also enables higher detection accuracy of VLM. Considering the sparsity of judgment-worthy episodes, the advanced exploration incentives based on the generated trajectory are introduced, enabling more efficient exploration toward judgment-worthy trajectories for more VLM reward triggers and thus gaining higher RL efficiency. Extensive experiments in MetaWorld demonstrate VLMeg achieves state-of-the-art from-scratch RL, outperforming advanced VLM-based baselines on 12 challenging reward-free tasks. Furthermore, VLMeg also enables effective RL without any ground-truth reward in 3 challenging real-world experiments. Code will be open after acceptance at https://github.com/Raina915/VLMeg.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.