Skip to content

Solvating machine-learning interatomic potentials for solution-phase chemistry

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 69 references
Physics Computer Science

Abstract

Most machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are trained on gas-phase data, which limits their use for chemistry in solution. Here, we introduce AnySolv, a transferable implicit solvation potential that provides solvent-dependent energy and force corrections to existing gas-phase potentials without retraining them. It is trained on 1.4 million solvation energies and forces computed with density functional theory (DFT) and SMD in 36 solvents, spanning charged, open-shell, and transition-state structures. Because solvents are represented by continuous physical descriptors, AnySolv supports 179 solvents, including those absent from training. On external benchmarks, AnySolv reproduces DFT-SMD solvation energies to 2-4 meV mean absolute error at more than three orders of magnitude lower cost, and it matches the accuracy of DFT-SMD against experimental solvation free energies. This enables screening of the mechanisms of 120 nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions in six phases as well as molecular dynamics simulations that reproduce the experimentally observed solvent-dependent conformational preferences of alanine dipeptide. By providing transferable solvation corrections to existing MLIPs, AnySolv enables scalable simulations of solvent-dependent chemical reactivity and molecular dynamics.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.