Skip to content

RET Variant Reclassification across Demographic Sub-Groups in a Large-Scale Clinical Population.

Oct 2026 · Thyroid · pp. 10507256261493762 · 0 citations · 28 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The expansion of RET germline testing coincided with substantial reclassification of VUSs, highlighting the importance of periodic laboratory reassessment.

Abstract

Background

The expanded use of germline testing panels that include the RET proto-oncogene has identified many variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). It remains poorly understood how many RET VUSs are returned in clinical practice, how many are ultimately reclassified, and which patient populations are affected most.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study of individuals tested for RET germline variants between 2017 and 2024 as part of routine clinical diagnostic testing at Ambry Genetics. Samples underwent next-generation sequencing, and variants were reported with their associated five-tier pathogenicity classification. Variant reclassification was measured as a change between initial and updated classification status on a per-variant and per-person basis. Test requisition forms, pedigrees, and clinic notes were used to associate genetic test results with demographic and clinical patient characteristics.

Results

Among 616,077 individuals who underwent RET germline genetic testing that included RET, 969 (0.2%) had a RET PV, and 5516 (0.9%) had a RET VUS. A total of 1607 (29%) individuals with initial RET VUSs were reclassified. Most variants (164/166; 98.8%) and individuals (1605/1607; 99.9%) were reclassified as benign. The prevalence of VUS on initial classification was significantly higher in individuals self-reporting as Asian (1.5%), Black (1.3%), and Hispanic (1%) compared with those self-reporting as White (0.8%). Reclassification reduced the proportion of VUSs within race and ethnicity groups, but relative differences remained statistically significant.

Conclusions

The expansion of RET germline testing coincided with substantial reclassification of VUSs, highlighting the importance of periodic laboratory reassessment. Most reclassifications were benign, which is cautiously reassuring for clinical counseling of patients. Both further characterization of RET variants and society guidance on clinical management of VUS test results are needed as genetic testing continues to expand.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Phenotypic manifestations and variant reclassification of germline PTEN variants: a nationwide Danish study.

The authors identified 87 different PTEN variants, and application of PTEN gene-specific ACMG guidelines led to reclassification of 32 variants, underscoring the importance of regular variant reassessment using the most recent gene-specific guidelines, ensuring optimal patient management and surveillance.

Annette Lyngholm Sandsdalen, A. M. Jelsig, B. Bertelsen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Integrated Clinical-Genomic Reanalysis Identifies Diagnostic Gaps and Candidate Genes in a Pediatric Rare Disease Cohort

Purpose Children with suspected rare genetic disorders often remain undiagnosed after exome, gene panel, or chromosomal microarray testing. We sought to define recurrent missed-diagnosis mechanisms and evaluate an integrated clinical-genomic reanalysis framework. Methods We studied 75 participants with rare or striking...

Hong-Qiu Gu, A. Sabo, S. Jangam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Gene-specific reclassification patterns of variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Genetic variant interpretation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) evolves as population reference datasets expand, gene-disease validity assessments examine new candidate genes and additional functional and segregation evidence accumulates. Periodic re-interpretation is, therefore, necessary. Likely pathogenic/pathog...

A. Bakalakos, Rebeca Lorca, A. Protonotarios et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Abstract B076: Germline variation in cancer susceptibility genes among Black cancer survivors in the Reclassifying Variants for Equity in Clinical Care (REVEAL) study

Black cancer survivors who undergo clinical genetic testing are more likely to carry variants of uncertain significance (VUS) than White survivors. VUS lack evidence for clinical intervention, leaving patients with confusion and anxiety. We characterized variation in known cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohor...

Shao-Miao Xia, Yue Zhao, A. Scott et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Double heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in patients referred to a tertiary cancer genetics clinic in Singapore

The findings emphasise the need for tailored genetic evaluation and further research to guide evidence-based management for this complex patient population and the need for tailored genetic evaluation for this complex patient population of cancer patients.

R. Wong, Yi-Ong Pei, S. Ow et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.