2026· International Journal of Information and Education Technology· Vol 16, pp. 2541-2550· 0 citations· 32 references
TL;DR
This study provides an instrument identifying factors that affect the continuance intention toward generative Artificial Intelligence tools in the educational sector by integrating frameworks of the Information System Success Model and Expectation-Confirmation Model, as well as privacy concerns and trust.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop and validate an instrument identifying factors that affect the continuance intention toward generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the educational sector by integrating frameworks of the Information System (IS) Success Model and Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), as well as privacy concerns and trust. Constructs examined are perceived usefulness, trust, system quality, satisfaction, and other relevant dimensions. Expert reviews, pre-testing, and statistical techniques including Cronbach’s alpha and Exploratory Factor Analysis using Principal Axis Factoring were employed to assess reliability and construct validity respectively, with reliability results exceeding 0.75. The final questionnaire contained 21 items addressing these dimensions. Even though the study does not test the significance of these factors, it identifies and operationalizes key constructs that will subsequently help future empirical research. This study provides a strong instrument that forms the foundation for understanding how Generative AI tools could be integrated into education to support personalized learning and improve accessibility. These insights can contribute to the improvement of user experience and more effective AI-based educational tools by policymakers, educators, and developers alike.
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational ecosystems necessitates a deeper understanding of how future teachers conceptualize AI-supported tools. This study examines pre-service teachers’ perceptions across four dimensions: perceived usefulness, digital self-efficacy, trust in AI, and perce...
Ciprian Baciu, Letiția Muntean-Trif· Revista Romaneasca pentru Ed...· 0 citations
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education raises important questions regarding their impact on student learning. Based on established technology acceptance frameworks, this study develops and empirically tests an integrative model that explains students’ attitudes t...
Golan Carmi· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that developmental benefits in students' collaboration with GenAI are better understood as theory consistent structural relationships shaped by contextual guidance, calibrated trust, and active regulation rather than as automatic consequences of frequent AI use.
Fan-Shuai Bu, Wei Li· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Evidence is provided that SAGAI is a valid and reliable instrument for use in English-speaking contexts and offers a structured framework for examining student attitudes toward GenAI in cross-cultural research.
Gürhan Durak, B. Rienties, Felipe Tessarolo· Journal of educational compu...· 0 citations
The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) has transformed higher education by providing intelligent support for students in information seeking, idea generation, academic task completion, and self-directed learning. Despite its widespread adoption, understanding the factors influencing...
Nicky Steven, D. Syamsuar· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.