Oct 2026· Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology· 0 citations· 33 references
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Abstract
Crime-related social media content provides valuable information for situational awareness and policy support; however, engagement-driven signals, such as likes and retweets, can introduce popularity bias and affect predictive outcomes. This study proposes a fairness-aware, Pareto-based, multi-objective optimization framework for feature selection and Random Forest hyperparameter optimization, leveraging textual and engagement features. A dataset of 32,000 crime-related tweets covering Fraud, Accident, and Murder was represented using TF-IDF and interaction-based features. Four optimization strategies, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (ERL), and Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), were comparatively evaluated. NSGA-II jointly maximized classification performance while minimizing a fairness penalty based on Statistical Parity Difference (SPD), Disparate Impact (DI), and Equality of Opportunity Difference (EOD). In this study, fairness refers to mitigating engagement-driven popularity bias across behavioral user groups rather than demographic discrimination. NSGA-II achieved an accuracy of 0.8118 and an F1-score of 0.8051, with an SPD of 0.08, DI of 0.97, and EOD of 0.06, demonstrating the most favorable balance between predictive performance and behavioral fairness. Although removing engagement features improved standalone Accuracy and F1-score, retaining them enabled explicit assessment and mitigation of engagement-driven bias. Stratified cross-validation and comparative analysis across the optimization strategies further supported the consistency of the observed results. The findings demonstrate that integrating fairness objectives directly into Pareto-based optimization provides a practical and interpretable approach to balancing predictive effectiveness and engagement-driven fairness in crime-related social media analytics.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.