Results show that a compiler-defined symbolic interface turns native kernel synthesis into verified design-space exploration: compiler infrastructure preserves legality and correctness, while neural guidance improves workload-specific performance with lower search cost and complete coverage.
Abstract
Emerging accelerators often lack mature compiler backends, motivating neural agents that generate and repair kernels from architectural documentation and simulator feedback. This approach repeatedly reconstructs workload-invariant machine semantics--including instruction behavior, legality constraints, synchronization rules, and memory protocols--for every workload. We argue that these semantics should be compiled once into a persistent symbolic artifact, while neural reasoning should focus on workload-dependent mapping decisions. We present Zomboss, a compiler-mediated agentic framework for kernel generation that places neural search within a verified compiler boundary. Zomboss compiles machine semantics and legality constraints into a reusable mapping interface, then uses a neural agent to optimize workload-dependent decisions within the validated mapping space. Across 20 Gemmini and 36 PLENA workload instances, Zomboss returns a correct verified kernel on all 56 instances. Relative to the compiler default, Zomboss achieves geometric-mean speedups of $3.34\times$ on Gemmini and $1.10\times$ on PLENA. Relative to direct agentic generation, it reduces inference tokens by 71.2% on Gemmini and 54.2% on PLENA. These results show that a compiler-defined symbolic interface turns native kernel synthesis into verified design-space exploration: compiler infrastructure preserves legality and correctness, while neural guidance improves workload-specific performance with lower search cost and complete coverage.
CAKE, a compiler-agent co-design in which agents author CAKE IR, a typed, hardware-explicit schedule representation, exposes warp roles, memory movement, synchronization, and pipelines while supporting verification, cost modeling, and localized diagnostics.
Zihao Ye, Yingyi Huang, H. Jin et al.· 4 citations
LLM4LLM is introduced, a deployment-aware closed-loop optimization framework that starts from a target inference script, extracts phase-aware optimization tasks, searches with an experience-guided episodic agent, and accepts patches through in-model validation.
Hui Zeng, Pengfei Yang, Yanxin Chen et al.· 0 citations
This work presents MaxKernel, a multi-agent system that implements three distinct paradigms for TPU kernel development: a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) agent for collaborative, step-by-step design; an Autonomous (Auto) agent that executes a fully automated, metric/trace-driven optimization loop; and a Graph-Based Autonomous...
Shang-Kun Wang, Nina Cai, Charles Hoong et al.· 0 citations
A domain-specific debug agent is presented that addresses three core challenges in autonomous repair: mitigating knowledge scarcity through retrieved patterns and diagnostic instrumentation, ensuring integrity through anti-cheat detection and full-coverage evaluation, and controlling cost via convergence guards and bou...
Yansong Sun, Shenxi Wu, Siyuan Chen et al.· 0 citations
The Agent-Ass kernels outperform the Full-Agent artifacts across the evaluated definitions, indicating that expert-provided optimization directions, high-quality references, and workload context remain critical for reliable AI-driven kernel optimization.
Yue Shui, Chenyu Ma, Hang Xu et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
KernelGenBench is presented, the first unified multi-source and multi-chip infrastructure for evaluating LLM- and agent-generated Triton kernels and establishes operator source, hardware platform, and agentic scaffold as distinct dimensions of kernel-generation capability, and shows that success in a familiar source-ha...
Pei-Yu Zang, Jian-Hang Tao, Jia-Ling Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.