Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Copilot CLI Local Memory

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Copilot CLI Local Memory v1.1.2 — Citation and provenance This release makes the project's authorship, design history, and public release chronology explicit and machine-readable. It does not change the plugin's runtime behaviour. What changed Added CITATION.cff so GitHub, Zenodo, reference managers, and researchers can identify and cite the software consistently. Added DESIGN-AND-PROVENANCE.md to record the implemented design, public release chronology, and relationship to earlier Copilot memory proposals. Added Shankar Balakrishna to the MIT copyright notice. Linked the citation and provenance records from the README. Prepared the release for independent preservation through Zenodo and Software Heritage. The provenance document deliberately acknowledges earlier public proposals for persistent and local Copilot memory. The contribution recorded here is this project's concrete implementation: explicit save, search, and delete commands over plain local modular-instruction files, with deterministic search, optional file scopes, duplicate and common-secret detection, and no database or server. Verification All 11 automated tests pass. The Agent Plugins v1.0.0 manifest checks pass. CITATION.cff validates against the Citation File Format 1.2.0 schema. Runtime behaviour is unchanged from v1.1.1. Install or update copilot plugin install shankarnarayanb/copilot-cli-local-memory copilot --experimental Verify the plugin with /plugin list and /extensions manage. Full Changelog: https://github.com/shankarnarayanb/copilot-cli-local-memory/compare/v1.1.1...v1.1.2

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 5, 2026

Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit

AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…

GPT-Lab Nov 3, 2026

Sovereignty Is the Option to Leave

Is your company’s AI sovereign? A practical guide for CIOs on AI vendor lock-in, EU Data Act switching, cloud sovereignty, and testing your exit plan before you need it. The post Sovereignty Is the Option to Leave appeared first on GPT-Lab.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 30, 2026

From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence

Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.