Skip to content

Show Me How You Reason and I'll Tell You Who You Are: Reasoning Graphs for Robust LLM Authorship Attribution

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.14905 · 0 citations · 61 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A graph neural network approach is proposed that leverages reasoning graphs extracted by an argument mining pipeline, demonstrating improved robustness and generalisation over a traditional Longformer baseline and outperforms the baseline under obfuscation attacks.

Abstract

Given the current trend to employ large language models (LLMs) in almost any imaginable context, LLM-generated text detection and authorship attribution have become a pressing issue. Prior work has primarily focused on surface-level linguistic features, an approach shown to be susceptible to paraphrasing and other obfuscation techniques. In this paper, we go beyond the linguistic surface, extracting and analysing reasoning structures in LLM-generated texts with the goal of capturing more complex signals of LLM authorship. We propose a graph neural network approach that leverages reasoning graphs extracted by an argument mining pipeline, demonstrating improved robustness and generalisation over a traditional Longformer baseline. Our approach outperforms the baseline by up to 27 percentage points under the obfuscation attacks such as paraphrasing and backtranslation, and 19 percentage points when evaluated on the texts generated by the unseen model versions, simulating real-world conditions in which new LLM versions are continuously released.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Do LLMs Make More Mistakes If They Do Not Believe the Input Data?

How faithfulness of LLMs to provided context depends on how plausible they perceive the context to be (context-memory conflict) is analyzed, which makes use of the increased difficulty of non-English and low-resource language text generation and input data based on local knowledge.

Peter Kochelka, Aleš Manuel Papáček, Vojtěch Dvořák et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

LLM-assisted writing and citation advantage: evidence from scientific publications before and after ChatGPT release

Analysis of a large-scale dataset covering 234,073 research papers published between 2019 and 2025 suggests that AI-assisted writing confers a modest but systematic advantage in visibility and discoverability that translates into higher measured impact.

S. Paklina, P. Parshakov, Elena Rapoport · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting

Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance. Accurate attribution on unmodified text, however, does not show whether the prediction still identifies the original source after deliberate rewriting. We formulate this...

Hao-Han Yuan, Si-Min Chen, Xi Niu et al. · 0 citations
Review

Let Me Explain!

Text content is the dominant factor in annotation decisions, far outweighing annotator demographics, and that content-focused SHAP explanations are more effective than demographic persona prompting for guiding LLM annotations, showing that explainability methods can improve both the reliability and the transparency of...

Hadi Mohammadi · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

The Invisible Signature: A Stylometric and Probabilistic Approach to Detecting AI-Generated Text in Academic Thesis Introductions

Since ChatGPT became publicly available in November 2022, the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in academic writing has spread well beyond institutions with abundant digital resources. The University of Madagascar is no exception: conversational AI assistants, accessible via a simple smartphone, have become commonpla...

Elyah Frisco Andriantsialo, Volatiana Marielle Ratianantitra, T. Mahatody · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.