Skip to content
Review Open access

Weak Foundations: Material Interests, Fairness Beliefs, and Support for Free Markets in Latin America

Oct 2026 · Kyklos (Basel) · 0 citations · 23 references

Abstract

Why do some citizens support free market economies whereas others do not? Classic theories in political economy emphasize two broad explanations—material self‐interest and fairness‐related values—as key determinants of market attitudes. Using harmonized survey data from 18 Latin American countries, we put these perspectives to a direct empirical test. Our analysis combines multiple indicators of economic interest (income, state dependence, and public‐sector ties) with attitudinal measures related to fairness (acceptance of inequality, meritocratic beliefs, and perceptions of gender equality). Surprisingly, neither material interests nor fairness‐based attitudes provide strong or consistent explanations of support for free markets. Although some variables reach statistical significance, their substantive effects are generally small and often inconsistent. Overall, the findings suggest that, despite deep inequality in Latin America, economic position and fairness beliefs provide only limited and inconsistent explanations of citizens' orientations toward market economies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

How perceived economic inequality shapes political efficacy: The mediating role of institutional trust

Economic inequality shapes citizens' attitudes and democratic support, yet little is known about how perceived inequality influences political efficacy. This research examines the relationship between perceived economic inequality and political efficacy, testing institutional trust as a psychosocial mechanism under...

Mar Montoya-Lozano, Guillermo B. Willis, Juan Diego García-Castro et al. · 0 citations
Review

Inequality perceptions, fairness beliefs, and redistributive preferences

This dissertation examines how perceived distributive fairness relates to redistributive preferences in Asia, and how COVID-period economic hardship is associated with changes in these attitudes. Using repeated cross-sectional data from the Asian Barometer Survey, Waves 4–6 (2014–2023), the thesis defines fairness perc...

Julavate Nijathaworn · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Selective Moralism Trap: Trust, Legitimacy, and Sovereignty in the Contestation of the Liberal International Order

Background and Aims: This conceptual review article examines why accusations of Western double standards have become a durable frame in the contestation of the liberal international order. Existing international-relations scholarship has explained this contestation mainly through changes in material power, norm diffusi...

F. Verri · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

No constituency for universal basic income? Evidence from seven Latin American countries

Despite the expansion of non-contributory cash transfer programmes in Latin America – especially during the COVID-19 pandemic – public support for a universal basic income (UBI) remains remarkably low. Using original survey data from seven countries, we find that fewer than 10 per cent of respondents support both the...

Fabián A. Borges, Juliana Martínez Franzoni, Merike Blofield · 0 citations
Review 2025

Moral Foundations Theory Across 28 Nations: Cross-Cultural Variation in Harm, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity Foundations and Their Association With Political Orientation

This study investigates cross-national variation in moral foundations theory subscales (Harm, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, Purity) across 28 countries and their differential associations with political orientation across cultural contexts within the context of cross-cultural psychology and moral cognition, an area of...

Miriam T. Vogel, Olumide K. Adeyemi, Soo-Jin M. Park · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Balancing Particularism and Universalism in Welfare Policy: Insights From China's Hukou Reform

Welfare policies often combine particularistic and universalistic elements, yet we know less about how shifts in this balance shape public attitudes toward vulnerable low‐status groups. This article develops a three‐dimensional framework for analyzing welfare policy, distinguishing among welfare scope, welfare benefi...

Liu Chen, Tom Christensen, Xu-Feng Zhu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.