Changing disturbance regimes and uncertain recovery trajectories under global change have created a need for conceptual models to guide forest management within a sustainability framework. This conceptual article develops on operational framework for ecosystem memory in forest ecosystems. Conventional views of resilience may foster the misleading assumption that ecosystem development follows a fixed trajectory within the boundaries of the natural range of variation. However, climate change may transform resilience mechanisms, causing forest ecosystems to shift beyond their historical range of variation. Under such conditions, the concept of ecosystem memory offers a framework for analyzing and quantifying temporal system properties. The constraints inherited through memory patterns are themselves likely to be modified under changing environmental conditions. A valid interpretation of ecosystem memory requires a clear ontological understanding of memory components as material entities organized under temporal and spatial constraints. The human memory metaphor is an appealing entry point for understanding ecosystem memory but risks erroneously attributing semantic encoding and representational processes to ecological systems, where no such mechanisms exist. Based on a narrative synthesis of 39 publications, supplemented by an updated Web of Science search that identified 396 records, we develop an operational ecosystem-memory framework that distinguishes persistent ecological legacies from functionally active memory by linking ecological imprints, ecosystem engrams, and measurable ecosystem responses. The framework provides a basis for identifying and monitoring measurable legacy variables, including deadwood, retained trees, regeneration, soil properties, and refugial structures, in post-disturbance forest management.
Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutio...
L. V. Dicks, C. Fitzsimmons, S. Bailey· Conservation Letters· 0 citations
Abstract The impacts of global climate change have compelled forest managers to evaluate their practices and ecosystems, considering when and how to resist change, promote resilience, or facilitate transitions. Forest adaptation has made significant strides to move from theory to practice over the last two decades, wit...
Peter W. Clark, Anthony W. D'Amato, L. Nagel et al.· Ecological Applications· 0 citations
While most research tracks forest area changes, a critical gap exists in understanding the qualitative pathways behind them and their ecological consequences. Current approaches, including Forest Transition Theory, often treat diverse forests and monoculture plantations as equivalent,
masking the damaging ‘great fores...
S. Chisika, C. Yeom· International forestry revie...· 0 citations
Changing climatic conditions and disturbance regimes are reshaping ecosystems globally, with profound implications for forest carbon dynamics. Because California’s forests represent a substantial carbon sink, understanding how climate-driven disturbances will alter their capacity to store and sequester carbon is crit...
Charles J. Maxwell, B. Sleeter, M. Hurteau et al.· Carbon Balance and Managemen...· 0 citations
The third edition of the Society for Ecological Restoration's International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration places recovery of “native ecosystems” at the center of what counts as legitimate ecological restoration. Here I argue that, in the Anthropocene, this emphasis reflects a val...