Skip to content
Open access

Ecosystem Memory: Defining a Concept for Sustainable Forest Management

Sep 2026 · Sustainability · Vol 18, pp. 9135 · 0 citations · 67 references

Abstract

Changing disturbance regimes and uncertain recovery trajectories under global change have created a need for conceptual models to guide forest management within a sustainability framework. This conceptual article develops on operational framework for ecosystem memory in forest ecosystems. Conventional views of resilience may foster the misleading assumption that ecosystem development follows a fixed trajectory within the boundaries of the natural range of variation. However, climate change may transform resilience mechanisms, causing forest ecosystems to shift beyond their historical range of variation. Under such conditions, the concept of ecosystem memory offers a framework for analyzing and quantifying temporal system properties. The constraints inherited through memory patterns are themselves likely to be modified under changing environmental conditions. A valid interpretation of ecosystem memory requires a clear ontological understanding of memory components as material entities organized under temporal and spatial constraints. The human memory metaphor is an appealing entry point for understanding ecosystem memory but risks erroneously attributing semantic encoding and representational processes to ecological systems, where no such mechanisms exist. Based on a narrative synthesis of 39 publications, supplemented by an updated Web of Science search that identified 396 records, we develop an operational ecosystem-memory framework that distinguishes persistent ecological legacies from functionally active memory by linking ecological imprints, ecosystem engrams, and measurable ecosystem responses. The framework provides a basis for identifying and monitoring measurable legacy variables, including deadwood, retained trees, regeneration, soil properties, and refugial structures, in post-disturbance forest management.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Recovering Ecosystems As Well As Their Constituent Parts

Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutio...

L. V. Dicks, C. Fitzsimmons, S. Bailey · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive silviculture for climate change in North American forests: Operationalizing the resistance–resilience–transition framework

Abstract The impacts of global climate change have compelled forest managers to evaluate their practices and ecosystems, considering when and how to resist change, promote resilience, or facilitate transitions. Forest adaptation has made significant strides to move from theory to practice over the last two decades, wit...

Peter W. Clark, Anthony W. D'Amato, L. Nagel et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Beyond forest cover: a global analysis of qualitative transition pathways and their ecological consequences

While most research tracks forest area changes, a critical gap exists in understanding the qualitative pathways behind them and their ecological consequences. Current approaches, including Forest Transition Theory, often treat diverse forests and monoculture plantations as equivalent, masking the damaging ‘great fores...

S. Chisika, C. Yeom · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Different models, similar outcomes: projected loss of forest carbon in California under climate change

Changing climatic conditions and disturbance regimes are reshaping ecosystems globally, with profound implications for forest carbon dynamics. Because California’s forests represent a substantial carbon sink, understanding how climate-driven disturbances will alter their capacity to store and sequester carbon is crit...

Charles J. Maxwell, B. Sleeter, M. Hurteau et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Restoration in the Anthropocene: reconsidering the primacy of “native ecosystems”

The third edition of the Society for Ecological Restoration's International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration places recovery of “native ecosystems” at the center of what counts as legitimate ecological restoration. Here I argue that, in the Anthropocene, this emphasis reflects a val...

Baruch Rinkevich · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.