Skip to content

Interpreting Language Model Parameters

Oct 2026 · 4 citations · ⚡ 1 influential
Computer Science

TL;DR

The method, adVersarial Parameter Decomposition (VPD), optimizes for decompositions of neural network parameters into simple subcomponents that preserve the network's input-output behavior even when many subcomponents are ablated, including under ablations that are adversarially selected to destroy behavior.

Abstract

Mechanistic interpretability aims to uncover how neural networks use their parameters to implement their impressive neural algorithms. Although previous work has uncovered substantial structure in the intermediate representations that networks use, little progress has been made to understand how the parameters and nonlinearities of networks perform computations on those representations. In this work, we present a method that brings us closer to this understanding by decomposing a language model's parameters into subcomponents that each implement only a small part of the model's learned algorithm, while simultaneously requiring only a small fraction of those subcomponents to account for the network's behavior on any input. The method, adVersarial Parameter Decomposition (VPD), optimizes for decompositions of neural network parameters into simple subcomponents that preserve the network's input-output behavior even when many subcomponents are ablated, including under ablations that are adversarially selected to destroy behavior. This encourages learning subcomponents that provide short, mechanistically faithful descriptions of the network's behavior that should aggregate appropriately into more global descriptions of the network's learned algorithm. We study how sequences of interactions between these parameter subcomponents produce the network's output on particular inputs, enabling a new kind of'circuit'analysis. While more work remains to be done to deepen our understanding of how neural networks use their parameters to compute their behavior, our work suggests an approach to identify a small set of simple, mechanistically faithful subcomponents on which further mechanistic analysis can be based.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Sparse Transformer: a Controlled Testbed for Mechanistic Interpretability

Mechanistic interpretability aims to decompose neural network computations into human-understandable features, yet progress is limited by the absence of ground-truth units to evaluate against. We address this with a Sparse Transformer (ST): a 5-layer language model trained on TinyStories whose wide, TopK-sparse MLP for...

Anton Korznikov, Alexey Dontsov, Elena Tutubalina · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

The Polytopal Neural Network

Understanding how deep neural networks process information remains a central challenge. Existing interpretability methods often compromise structural fidelity, rely on prespecified corpora, or explain models post-hoc. We propose Polytopal Neural Networks (PNNs), a framework that extracts distinct layer-wise aspects by...

A. E. J. Wedenborg, A. V. Nørskov, Teresa Dorszewski et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

A Unifying Perspective on Language Model Representations: From Filler-Role Structure to Mechanistic Interpretability

This work proposes using Tensor Product Representations (TPRs) as a unifying hypothesis, and shows that TPRs can unify several prior interpretability methods: additive analogies, linear probing, sparse autoencoders, and activation patching.

Enshang Zhang, R. Thomas McCoy · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Misery of Mechanistic Interpretability: A Formal Perspective

Mechanistic interpretability has become the dominant lens for understanding frontier language models, as their inner workings are complex and inherently black boxes. To gain insights into these models, interpretable replacement networks (IRNs) are trained at all layers, exposing interpretable features through sparsely...

Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Are We Recovering Mechanisms? Objective-Level Recovery Gaps in Mechanistic Interpretability

It is shown that intervention-based faithfulness can prefer an equally sized circuit that reproduces the model's behavior less well, and restoring selected intact-model signals reverses 96 of 100 selected persistent misrankings, demonstrating that context distortion contributes to these failures.

Chu-Qin Geng, Li Zhang, Hao-Lin Ye et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.