By reverting mesenchymal phenotypes and normalizing the vasculature, the CTS protocol is designed to rescue the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment and restores cytotoxic T-cell homing, thereby converting immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot,” immunotherapy-responsive lesions.
Abstract
Since the introduction of the hallmarks of cancer framework over 25 years ago, treatment approaches have evolved into personalized medicine, offering benefits to select patient populations. However, three major components of heterotypic interactions in cancer—mutational evolution of cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP), and cancer-remodeled extracellular matrix (ECM)—remain critical barriers to therapy, particularly in patients who have failed treatment. EMP encompasses a spectrum of to-and-fro transitions between mesenchymal and epithelial states, yielding hybrid phenotypes of evolutionary heterogeneity. These are embedded in the vascular, metabolic, mutational, and immune-suppressive reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment (TME), induced and advanced by the hypoxia–reactive oxygen species (ROS)–hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)–transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling axis. This review systematically examines the molecular mechanisms underlying EMP, tumor heterogeneity, and the hallmarks of cancer. It explores pharmacological strategies to target tumor burden, epigenetically revert transitional states, and restore immune-editing functions. Based on this analysis, we propose a phased anti-hallmark Combinations, Timing, and Sequencing (CTS) protocol. The methodology integrates vascular normalization, epigenetic modifiers, trimodal radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), chemotherapy (CT), and immunotherapy optimization, aiming to improve outcomes while minimizing toxicities. Also, mechanistically, by reverting mesenchymal phenotypes and normalizing the vasculature, the CTS protocol is designed to rescue the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment—curtailing the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T (Treg) cells. This restores cytotoxic T-cell homing, thereby converting immunologically “cold” tumors into “hot,” immunotherapy-responsive lesions.
The present review explores the complex epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modification and RNA editing that drive GBM progression, shape the tumor microenvironment and facilitate immune evasion and highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting these epigenetic vulnerabilities through inhibitors...
This review comprehensively examines the cellular and acellular architecture of the TME, emphasizing its spatial organization, metabolic reprogramming, mechanical properties, and immunological regulation across diverse tumor types.
R. Latif, Taufiq Nawaz· Critical reviews in oncology...· 0 citations
This review systematically catalogs the identification methods and signature gene panels for distinct CAF subtypes in prostate cancer, with particular focus on the multilayered regulatory circuits through which these stromal cells shape the immune microenvironment.
Kan-Kan He, Zhi-Te Zhao, Jian-Hui Bai et al.· International Journal on Bio...· 0 citations
S spatiotemporal co-evolution is established as a unifying framework that transforms mCRPC from a uniformly fatal disease into a chronically manageable condition through precisely timed, spatially informed and mechanistically rational interventions.
Li Yan, Xiao-Ke Sun, Peng-Xiao Su· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This review highlights ZEB1 to resistance against standard-of-care treatments by metabolic reprogramming and modulation of androgen receptor signaling, and explores strategies to disrupt the regulatory circuitry of ZEB1 to overcome multidrug resistance.
Qianqian Wang, Jianing Wang, Yuxuan Zhao et al.· Critical reviews in oncology...· 0 citations
A narrative review summarizes the major signaling pathways implicated in GBM pathogenesis, including EGFR, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt, and TGF-β signaling, while also discussing emerging therapeutic targets such as FGFR3–TACC3 fusions, regorafenib, and natural killer cell-based immunotherapy.