Skip to content
Open access

Comparing LoRA, DoRA, and OFT for Extremely Low-Resource English–Sango Machine Translation: Adaptation Performance and Out-of-Domain Retention

Oct 2026 · Information · 0 citations · 21 references

Abstract

Extremely low-resource machine translation poses a difficult cross-lingual adaptation problem: improving target-language performance while preserving capabilities acquired through multilingual pretraining. This study compares three mathematically distinct parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods—LoRA, DoRA, and orthogonal fine-tuning (OFT)—for English–Sango translation using NLLB-200-distilled-600M, a deterministically constructed 9000-pair corpus, and three random seeds per method. Following standard domain-adaptation practice, adaptation-test performance and out-of-domain (OOD) change were evaluated separately using a native-speaker-validated adaptation test set and FLORES+ devtest, with corpus chrF as the primary metric and paired bootstrap testing with Holm correction. All nine adapted runs scored below zero-shot NLLB-200 on the complete adaptation test and FLORES+ devtest. However, the adaptation-side estimate was composition-sensitive: the descriptive direction reversed on the 38-item A-only subset, and checkpoint selection used an all-A development set whereas the final test was B-dominated. The complete adaptation-test result is therefore treated as exploratory. By contrast, the negative FLORES+ pattern was consistent across all nine adapted runs and persisted at fixed final checkpoints, making out-of-domain degradation the most stable performance finding. The methods nevertheless differed computationally: OFT used approximately one quarter of the trainable parameters required by LoRA or DoRA, whereas LoRA achieved the shortest wall-clock training time. These results provide a controlled multi-seed comparison of structurally distinct PEFT configurations for an extremely low-resource English–Sango setting and highlight the importance of considering data quality, zero-shot baselines, training variability, and computational efficiency alongside translation performance.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.