Skip to content

Learning in Infinitesimal Non-Compositional Sketches

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.15107 · 2 citations · ⚡ 1 influential · 33 references
Computer Science Mathematics

Abstract

This paper develops a categorical framework -- Learning in Infinitesimal Non-Compositional Sketches (LINCS) -- as the repair of non-compositionality: failures of diagrams to factor through quotient sketches lifted to the tangent category setting. Machine learning problems are specified as sketches: graphs with commutativity conditions $\mathcal D$, limit cones $\mathcal L$, and colimit cocones $\mathcal K$, generalizing the usual scalarization of loss functions or vector space assumptions. Non-compositionality is defined purely as failure of a universal factorization problem, not as arithmetic error between the desired and actual predictions. Given a learning sketch $\mathbb S=(S,\mathcal D,\mathcal L,\mathcal K)$, whose underlying graph is $S$, and a model $D:J \rightarrow C$, the base defect is the obstruction to factorization $\mbox{Obs}(\mbox{Fact}_{\mathbb S}(D))$. The tangent lift applies the tangent functor $T$ to obtain $TD:J \rightarrow C$, and LINCS is defined as the obstruction $\mbox{Obs}(\mbox{Fact}_{\mathbb S}(TD))$ -- asking whether infinitesimal perturbations preserve the compositionality constraints.The paper also introduces Tangent Learning Sketches, which are sketches equipped with Cockett-Cruttwell tangent structure. The paper defines the INC endofunctor, which iterates the tangent lift, producing a tower $D,TD,T^2D, \cdots$ of factorization problems. ML is thereby formulated as the search for a coalgebraic fixed point where successive tangent unfoldings stabilize ($\nu T_{\mbox{INC}}$). Using the Aczel--Mendler theorem, we prove existence of a final INC coalgebra whenever $T_{\mbox{INC}}$ admits a set-based class realization that creates its final carrier. A detailed experimental evaluation of LINCS is underway in a number of concrete ML settings, including deep learning, large language models, and reinforcement learning, and is described in companion papers.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Efficient Learning of Truncated Boolean Product Distributions: Influence to the Rescue

This work refine the existing parameter estimation guarantees under the fatness assumption, improving the prior sample complexity to $O( \log n / \epsilon^2)$ for $\ell_\infty$-recovery, matching the untruncated minimax rate.

Rohan Chauhan, Ioannis Panageas · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

SparseStack Is an Optimal Oblivious Subspace Embedding

It is proved that fully independent SparseStack achieves the oblivious subspace embedding parameters conjectured by Nelson and Nguyen (FOCS 2013) and the main theorem has been formally verified in Lean 4.

Diar Heidary · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Differentiable Horn Programs: A Constructive Expressivity Theorem for Latent Rule Operators

The LatentGamma operator, a differentiable operator on the unit cube designed as a smooth surrogate of Tarski's immediate consequence operator $\TP$ associated with a definite Horn program $P$ on $M$ atoms, is introduced and a matching information-theoretic lower bound on the parameter count is proved.

Aymen Mejri · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Sequential Euclidean connections with exponential memory: distributional performance and adversarial robustness

Comparison with the running mean highlights the stationary insertion-length distribution, its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory, and its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory.

P. D. de Castro · 1 citation · ⚡1

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.