Skip to content
#data science Open access

Beyond Editing Code: Uses for AI Tools in Scientific Work

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence Applications

Abstract

Critical research advancements require usable, reliable software products—including AI tooling—for high performance data and computing work. To improve AI systems we must understand scientists’ and engineers’ needs and define design best practices for building interfaces that facilitate collaboration between scientists and AI tools across ecosystems. Ensuring the long-term usability and utility of scientific software products and AI systems for communities protects critical investments, supports high quality research, and reduces end user challenges. This talk will present findings from our semi-structured interview study investigating how scientists and engineers use AI tools for their research work. We recruited from universities and national labs, seeking perspectives from multiple disciplines. Looking beyond common use of AI tools for coding tasks, we sought to understand the varied ways AI is or could be adopted in scientific settings. Our interviews investigated how users determine the utility of AI tools, the concerns they have about adoption, and expectations for agentic tooling in research infrastructures. In this talk, we discuss opportunities for AI tooling in science and engineering beyond coding support, providing a lens into the development work the US-RSE community may take on in the near future and the socio-technical circumstances driving it. Our results inform development priorities, strategies for issue mitigation, and long-term stewardship in scientific facilities and work. We anticipate our insights helping to improve the usability and stewardship of scientific software, especially for high performance data and computing work.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.