The results support separating perception from reasoning and point to perception under distribution shift as the main limitation.
Abstract
Surgical teams could benefit from assistants that watch the video for requested events, such as"tell me when the clip applier appears during Calot triangle dissection", and answer questions about what has already happened. We formalise this task as request-driven event detection with exact semantics and causal alert decisions, and present SurgStreamer. It separates procedure-specific perception, which maps the 1-FPS stream to a structured state over tools, actions and phases, from procedure-agnostic reasoning, which evaluates a formal monitoring condition over this state and an event memory, either with exact rules or with a small controller that addresses entities through pointers rather than names. We evaluate this monitoring core with gold conditions. On a pre-registered, sealed test set of 12 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, SurgStreamer reached a macro event-F1 of 0.598 over full procedures. On identical 75-s windows with only the window available to every method, it scored 0.677. The tested configurations of the streaming vision-language model OneStreamer-4B, including ones fine-tuned on SurgStreamer's state or on video with an adapted vision encoder, scored at most 0.540 (Holm-adjusted p<= 0.012). At three external centres, re-training only perception raised performance on held-out procedures from 0.239 to 0.470. On a new procedure, pituitary surgery, controller weights trained on cholecystectomy matched an in-domain controller on oracle state (0.947 vs 0.938). On predicted state they missed the pre-registered non-inferiority margin (-0.024 [-0.040, -0.008]) unless the alert thresholds were re-calibrated. The results support separating perception from reasoning and point to perception under distribution shift as the main limitation.
Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...
O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 465 citations
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.