Skip to content
Open access

From silos to shared problem framing: One Health policy priorities of European health professionals from transdisciplinary simulations

Sep 2026 · CABI One Health · 0 citations · 20 references

TL;DR

How OH challenges are shaped by governance processes, stakeholder interactions, and problem framing across sectors is demonstrated and suggests that the value of participatory OH learning lies in strengthening the capacity to navigate disagreement and complexity.

Abstract

Operationalising One Health (OH) remains challenging, even in countries with strong sectoral capacities, because successful implementation depends not only on specialised knowledge but also on governance, coordination, and shared problem framing. In Switzerland, federalism and professional silos further complicate cross-sectoral collaboration. This Policy Forum reflects on a role-play exercise conducted during an OH continuing education programme. Participants identified and prioritised OH challenges relevant to Switzerland, selected intensive livestock production as a focal issue, mapped key stakeholders, and engaged in a facilitated multi-actor role-play. The exercise showed how sectoral mandates initially dominated discussion and how active facilitation supported a shift in the discussion towards more integrative, system-oriented dialogue. As fundamental value conflicts persisted, the simulation revealed trade-offs, power asymmetries, and feasibility constraints. Partial alignment emerged around policy instruments rather than shared end goals. The findings suggest that the value of participatory OH learning lies in strengthening the capacity to navigate disagreement and complexity. Structured and facilitated dialogue can support shared problem framing and foster more reflexive OH governance, with direct relevance for policy preparation and training. This article demonstrates how OH challenges are shaped by governance processes, stakeholder interactions, and problem framing across sectors. It is relevant for policy makers, practitioners, and educators involved in OH implementation. By bringing together public health, veterinary, environmental, governmental, and societal perspectives in a simulated policy dialogue, the exercise revealed power dynamics and feasibility constraints that are unlikely to emerge in single-actor settings. The integration of academic and practical expertise supported the co-production of policy-relevant insights and strengthened participants’ capacity for cross-sectoral collaboration and reflexive OH governance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

From evidence to action: expert perspectives on stakeholder dialogues in Swiss health policy

Objectives Stakeholder dialogues are increasingly used to link research evidence with policy and practice in health systems. Yet little is known about the practical reasoning behind their design, conduct, and use. This study investigated how researchers and public-health professionals conceptualise and operationalise s...

S. Rubinelli, Cristina Mesa-Vieira, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Determinants of collaboration dynamics and challenges in North-South data-driven health research in the African context: an epistemic injustice perspective

Introduction Collaborations between Global North and South institutions are increasingly important for advancing artificial intelligence (AI) and data science in healthcare, offering opportunities to address context-specific challenges and reduce inequities. However, these partnerships often face persistent issues rela...

R. Bekele, A. Moen, Merga Belina et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

When Flexibility Becomes Ambiguity: Implementation Dilemmas in a Danish Community-Based Health Promotion Programme

Childhood overweight and obesity are major public health challenges, linked to social inequality. Community-based and system-oriented interventions have been promoted as alternatives to individually focused approaches, yet their implementation remains poorly understood. This study examines the implementation of a fle...

C. Leonhardt, Sigurd Lauridsen, Dina Danielsen · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Using theory of change to facilitate networks achieving their goals

Background: Across the Dutch healthcare system, and internationally, workforce shortages, fragmentation, and rising care demands are driving the need for stronger regional collaboration. Sustainable, integrated care depends on well-functioning networks that align diverse stakeholders around shared outcomes.To support t...

Dominic Vestering, M. Hoogeveen, V. V. van Druten · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Comparative Barriers and Enablers in ASEAN Long-Term Care Systems: Insights From the 2025 Regional Policy Dialogue and Policy Recommendations for Equitable Active Ageing.

OBJECTIVE To examine barriers and enablers to equitable long-term care (LTC) across ASEAN-Plus Three (APT) economies and to propose a framework for equitable active ageing, contributing to Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 10. METHODS A qualitative participatory-observation study was conducted during the 2025 Regio...

Ruttiya Bhula-or, Chadatan Osatis, O. Prasitsiriphon et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

STAKEHOLDER AND NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR STRENGTHENING GOVERNANCE AND HEALTH POLICY IN EDUCATIONAL HOSPITALS

It is concluded that integrating SA and SNA provides a comprehensive framework for diagnosing institutional dynamics, enhancing stakeholder collaboration, and promoting sustainable, equitable governance models in health-related initiatives.

Toto Gunarto, Mohamad Fazli Sabri, Widya Rizki Eka Putri et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.