Aug 2026· Cancers· Vol 18· 0 citations· 40 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is suggested that inviting women aged 45–74 for a mammogram every two years could prevent more breast cancer deaths and modestly extend both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy with an acceptable trade-off in additional testing, while more extensive screening brings less favorable incremental harm–benefit ratios.
Abstract
Simple Summary Breast cancer screening in Germany currently invites women aged 50–69 for a mammogram every two years. We used a Markov Model considering German data and practice patterns to compare several screening strategies that start at younger ages, end later, and varied how often mammograms are performed. We looked at patient-relevant outcomes such as breast cancer cases and deaths prevented, life expectancy, quality of life, and the number of extra mammograms and false-positives—to weigh benefits against burdens. Our results suggest that inviting women aged 45–74 for a mammogram every two years could prevent more breast cancer deaths and modestly extend both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy with an acceptable trade-off in additional testing, while more extensive screening brings less favorable incremental harm–benefit ratios. For policymakers, the results offer country-specific transparent evidence to refine screening guidelines.
ObjectivesEstimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis related to mammography screening vary substantially. Overdiagnosis is commonly defined as cases that would not have been detected during the person's remaining lifetime in the absence of screening. We here aim to quantify overdiagnosis in the population-based BreastScr...
Torunn Heggland, L. Vatten, S. Opdahl et al.· Journal of Medical Screening· 0 citations
758
Background:
Breast cancer risk prediction scores, such as the Gail Model, are commonly implemented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to guide clinical decision-making regarding breast cancer screening and chemoprevention. Yet, their implementation is inconsistent or limited to specific time periods or p...
Michelle Pistner Nixon, D. Hassen, Alicia M. Johns et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
Long-term evidence from randomized trials demonstrates that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality, and modern risk-adapted strategies reduce unnecessary investigations and overdiagnosis. The relevant policy choice is no longer between screening and no screening...
Sigrid V. Carlsson, R. V. D. van den Bergh· European Urology Focus· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. While overall incidence has declined, certain populations – particularly younger patients – have experienced a rise. This suggests a more complex risk profile than the dichotomous average vs high risk delineated in guidelines....
Kelsey L. Anderson, Sophie Montgomery, A. Winslow et al.· Expert Review of Gastroenter...· 0 citations
50
Background:
Clinical guidelines recommend against cervical cancer screening in average-risk women younger than 21 years. Nonetheless, prior studies suggest that 13.8% of women aged 15 to 20 years still receive potentially unnecessary cervical cancer screening. We sought to estimate the costs of guideline-dis...
Han-Wen Zhang, Navkiran K. Shokar, Anton L. V. Avanceña et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.