Skip to content
Open access

Age Limits of Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography—A Decision-Analytic Benefit–Harm Evaluation to Inform DecisionMaking for the German Context

Aug 2026 · Cancers · Vol 18 · 0 citations · 40 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is suggested that inviting women aged 45–74 for a mammogram every two years could prevent more breast cancer deaths and modestly extend both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy with an acceptable trade-off in additional testing, while more extensive screening brings less favorable incremental harm–benefit ratios.

Abstract

Simple Summary Breast cancer screening in Germany currently invites women aged 50–69 for a mammogram every two years. We used a Markov Model considering German data and practice patterns to compare several screening strategies that start at younger ages, end later, and varied how often mammograms are performed. We looked at patient-relevant outcomes such as breast cancer cases and deaths prevented, life expectancy, quality of life, and the number of extra mammograms and false-positives—to weigh benefits against burdens. Our results suggest that inviting women aged 45–74 for a mammogram every two years could prevent more breast cancer deaths and modestly extend both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy with an acceptable trade-off in additional testing, while more extensive screening brings less favorable incremental harm–benefit ratios. For policymakers, the results offer country-specific transparent evidence to refine screening guidelines.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Breast cancer overdiagnosis due to mammography screening-A long-term follow-up population study of BreastScreen Norway.

ObjectivesEstimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis related to mammography screening vary substantially. Overdiagnosis is commonly defined as cases that would not have been detected during the person's remaining lifetime in the absence of screening. We here aim to quantify overdiagnosis in the population-based BreastScr...

Torunn Heggland, L. Vatten, S. Opdahl et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Addressing gaps in breast cancer risk prediction scores in the electronic health record.

758 Background: Breast cancer risk prediction scores, such as the Gail Model, are commonly implemented in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to guide clinical decision-making regarding breast cancer screening and chemoprevention. Yet, their implementation is inconsistent or limited to specific time periods or p...

Michelle Pistner Nixon, D. Hassen, Alicia M. Johns et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Prostate Cancer Screening: The Population Benefit Outweighs the Harm (Pro).

Long-term evidence from randomized trials demonstrates that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality, and modern risk-adapted strategies reduce unnecessary investigations and overdiagnosis. The relevant policy choice is no longer between screening and no screening...

Sigrid V. Carlsson, R. V. D. van den Bergh · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: adjusting for individual risk factors

ABSTRACT Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. While overall incidence has declined, certain populations – particularly younger patients – have experienced a rise. This suggests a more complex risk profile than the dichotomous average vs high risk delineated in guidelines....

Kelsey L. Anderson, Sophie Montgomery, A. Winslow et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Economic burden of guideline-discordant cervical cancer screening among commercially insured women age 15 to 20 years.

50 Background: Clinical guidelines recommend against cervical cancer screening in average-risk women younger than 21 years. Nonetheless, prior studies suggest that 13.8% of women aged 15 to 20 years still receive potentially unnecessary cervical cancer screening. We sought to estimate the costs of guideline-dis...

Han-Wen Zhang, Navkiran K. Shokar, Anton L. V. Avanceña et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.