Oct 2026· The Lancet Regional Health - Americas· 32 references
Migration, Health and Trauma
Abstract
Background Parental immigration detention is a significant yet understudied stressor with potential consequences for children's well-being. We examined children's general health before, during, and after parental detention, and compared to the United States (US) pediatric population. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional household telephone survey in 2022–2023 of family members of immigrants detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2020/21 and released on bond. Of 88 respondents, we analyzed data from 49 families with at least one school-aged minor child. Family members retrospectively reported on child health before, during, and after detention using the 7-item parent-report version of the PROMIS® Parent Proxy Scale- Global Health 7 measure, which provides standardized T-scores (mean = 50, SD=10) benchmarked to the U.S. general population. Findings The mean T-scores were statistically equivalent to the population mean of 50 at pre-detention (49; 95% CI: 46.0, 52.0) and after release (48.9; 95% CI: 45.5, 52.4) but 17 T-score points (∼2 SD below the population mean) lower during detention (31.8; 95% CI: 28.6, 35.0), substantially exceeding the commonly accepted 5 T-score points threshold (half-SD) for clinically meaningful change. Reported problems for children during parental detention included decline in grades (n = 34, 69%), increased financial responsibilities (n = 29, 59%), household or caregiving responsibilities (n = 26, 53%), and food insecurity (n = 26, 53%). About 16% (n = 8) of children were unable to receive needed treatment or counseling from a mental health professional during parental detention. Interpretation Parental detention was associated with poorer reported child health, and reported health scores improved after release. Findings highlight the need for policies that consider the health consequences of immigration enforcement on children and families. Funding This research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the Russell Sage Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60