The combination of nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and AZD1775 was determined to be too toxic when administered in patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Abstract
Purpose
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a devastating disease for which there are limited treatment options. Identification of novel agents to enhance the activity of existing regimens is much needed. We hypothesized that the disruption of the DNA damage response by AZD1775, an oral Wee1 inhibitor, added to the nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy backbone would be safe and effective.
Methods
A phase I trial to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of AZD1775 in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was conducted in patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NCT02194829). A total of 7 patients received nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle, along with AZD1775 by mouth on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Toxicities were assessed using CTCAE version 4 criteria.
Results
Two patients were treated at the initial dose level of nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and AZD1775, and both experienced dose-limiting toxicities (dehydration, elevated bilirubin, oral mucositis, increased AST, and Candida intertrigo). Under a revised study design, 5 patients were treated, and 2 of them also developed dose-limiting toxicities (anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, hyponatremia, and febrile neutropenia). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among these 7 patients were 5.26 months (95% confidence interval [CI] [2.73, 12.16]) and 5.29 months (95% CI [2.73, 20.17]), respectively.
Conclusion
The combination of nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and AZD1775 was determined to be too toxic when administered in patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Treatment options for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have had progressive disease on FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil) are limited, and patients are typically treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Targeting therapeutic vulnerabilities...
B. Huffman, Haeseong Park, Nadine A. Jackson et al.· Cancer Research· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
S-1 has demonstrated non-inferiority to gemcitabine (GEM) in overall survival (OS) in advanced pancreatic cancer and superiority in the adjuvant setting for resectable disease. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 combined with GEM plus nab-paclitaxel (nPTX) in advanced pancreatic cancer.
ME...
Yoshiaki Nagatani, N. Chayahara, Hironaga Satake et al.· European Journal of Cancer· 0 citations
Exogenous l-glutamine has preclinical antitumor activity although formal clinical translation has not been attempted. We conducted a single-arm phase 1 trial to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of clinical-grade, US Food and Drug Administration-approved l-glutamine therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel...
Jun Gong, Hayato Muranaka, So-Yung Choi et al.· Nature Cancer· 0 citations
Summary Background Novel therapies are needed for advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) that recurs after chemotherapy + immunotherapy. Lenvatinib has antitumour activity in patients with aEC after platinum-based chemotherapy and is approved in combination with pembrolizumab for aEC following prior systemic therapy. E7386,...
Jung-Yun Lee, K. Hasegawa, Byoung-Gie Kim et al.· EClinicalMedicine· 0 citations
Camrelizumab plus apatinib demonstrated manageable toxicity and preliminary antitumor activity, supporting further investigation of this chemotherapy-free strategy in early-stage TNBC patients with enriched TILs.
Z. Tian, Heng-Yu Li, Yujun Deng et al.· Breast Cancer Research and T...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.