Skip to content
Open access

INTERPRETATION AND VERIFICATION OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL DECISIONS: TAXONOMY OF METHODS, TRUST METRICS,AND EVALUATION PROTOCOLS

Oct 2026 · Інфокомунікаційні та комп'ютерні технології · pp. 248 · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

A five-level taxonomy of large language model interpretation methods is proposed, covering the range from the analysis of individual neuron activations to behavioral testing at the level of complete textual outputs, and it is demonstrated that proper probability calibration is a necessary prerequisite for the practical application of interpretation and verification results.

Abstract

The rapid evolution and adoption of large language models in domains with a high cost of error, including healthcare, law, finance, and education, where incorrect or factually inaccurate responses may lead to erroneous decisions, necessitate the study of the theoretical and practical aspects of the interpretation, calibration, evaluation, and verification of large language model outputs.This article systematizes contemporary approaches to the interpretation and verification of large language model decisions and identifies the roles of trust metrics in constructing protocols for assessing their reliability. The study analyzes methods of mechanistic interpretability, including sparse autoencoders and computational circuit tracing, approaches to chain-of-thought analysis, calibration metrics such as Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Brier score, semantic entropy, verbalized confidence, and conformal prediction. Particular attention is devoted to the standardized evaluation frameworks HELM and LM Evaluation Harness, the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm, as well as factuality assessment methods including FActScore, SAFE, and SelfCheckGPT. Based on the conducted analysis, a five-level taxonomy of large language model interpretation methods is proposed, covering the range from the analysis of individual neuron activations to behavioral testing at the level of complete textual outputs. Trust metrics are grouped according to their level of practical maturity, while factuality verification approaches are compared in terms of verification granularity, dependence on external knowledge sources, and computational cost. It is demonstrated that proper probability calibration is a necessary prerequisite for the practical application of interpretation and verification results. Future research should focus on the development of comprehensive evaluation protocols covering the entire lifecycle of a large language model – from training to deployment in production systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Development of a Framework for Evaluating Large Language Model Safety and Reliability: a Proof-of-Concept Evaluation

In this single-centre proof-of-concept, aggregate accuracy was insufficient for safety characterisation: models with indistinguishable mean accuracy carried different catastrophic-failure tiers and reproducibility profiles.

Fang-Yan Liu, Zhi Liu, Xiaolu Fei et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

A primer on evaluation methods for large language models in healthcare

This article aims to provide a pragmatic basis for designing and executing rigorous evaluations of healthcare LLMs by describing underlying concepts and potential pitfalls, while emphasizing the importance of aligning evaluation methods with the research question.

S. E. McKinney, P. Vu, S. Justice et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Variability, algorithm conformance, and accuracy of large language model–based tools for risk-of-bias (RoB 2.0) assessment of randomized trials: a pilot study

Background: Large language model (LLM)–based tools are increasingly used to automate risk-of-bias assessment of randomized controlled trials with the revised Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0). However, their reproducibility, their accuracy, and their fidelity to the deterministic algorithm mapping signalling-question responses t...

Jiae Choi, Heather Swan, Min Jung Kim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Assessing safety and trustworthiness of large language models in medicine

It is shown that current large language models generally perform poorly on most of the safety tests, regardless of their safety alignment mechanisms, which underscores the crucial need for ongoing human oversight and the implementation of strict safety guardrails before deploying these tools in clinical practice.

Yi-Fan Yang, Qiao Jin, Robert Leaman et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Sep 2026

The economics of accuracy for medical reasoning with large language models

A general framework with equations to balance cost-benefit trade-offs when engineering LLM-based systems for medical reasoning and QA is formulated and generalizable configurations, designs, and patterns are recommended to achieve accuracy and efficiency objectives.

Kiran Bhattacharyya, S. Kamabattula · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Explainability and Reliability in Large Language Model Systems: A Survey of SHAP, LIME and Attention Frameworks

Increasing adoption of language models in sensitive sectors such as healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, education, etc., highlights the significance of developing transparent decision support systems. This paper reviews the use of explanation techniques for language and machine learning models, including SHAP, LIME, at...

Mary Shakkina C, Miranda Lakshmi Travis · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.