Skip to content
Review Open access

AI-Assisted Speaking Practice and Human-Directed Communicative Readiness: Survey and Scenario Evidence on Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Evaluation Pressure

Sep 2026 · Behavioral Science · 0 citations · 87 references

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) voice tools create low-risk opportunities for second-language (L2) speaking practice, but it remains unclear whether AI-assisted speaking practice is associated with human-directed communicative readiness and how this relationship varies across learners and evaluation contexts. Study 1 analysed cross-sectional survey data from 708 English learners. Greater AI-assisted spoken English behaviour (AISB) was associated with higher human-directed willingness to communicate (HWTC; β = 0.384) and lower foreign-language speaking anxiety (FLSA; β = −0.416); FLSA was negatively associated with HWTC when AISB was controlled (β = −0.325), yielding a positive statistical indirect association (0.127, 95% CI [0.079, 0.184]). Speaking self-efficacy (SSE) moderated the FLSA–HWTC association, including an unexpected upper-tail crossover. Demographic adjustment left the substantive pattern essentially unchanged, and an unmeasured latent method factor (ULMC) sensitivity analysis showed materially stable focal factor-score associations after accounting for a general method factor. Study 2 used a 2 × 2 nonrandom scenario comparison (N = 726), in which participants imagined preparation with an AI voice assistant versus smartphone recording under formal evaluation versus no evaluation. AI-voice-assistant scenarios showed lower anticipated FLSA and higher anticipated HWTC, whereas formal evaluation showed the opposite pattern; tool × evaluation interactions were significant for FLSA (ηp2 = 0.032) and HWTC (ηp2 = 0.047). Speaking-initiation tendency showed a different interaction pattern, indicating that HWTC and speaking-initiation tendency are not identical. The findings support a competence–affect–context account of AI-assisted speaking practice and human-directed communicative readiness, but they do not establish AI-specific causal effects or transfer to actual human speaking.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.