Skip to content
Preprint

DD-RNO: A Domain-Decomposed Routed Neural Operator for Airfoil Flow Prediction

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 46 references
Physics

TL;DR

Deep learning surrogates for RANS flow prediction around airfoils face two persistent bottlenecks: sharp near-wall boundary layers and smooth far-field potential flow, and numerical instability of computing wall-normal velocity gradients from continuous-field approximations.

Abstract

Deep learning surrogates for RANS flow prediction around airfoils face two persistent bottlenecks. A single neural architecture cannot simultaneously resolve sharp near-wall boundary layers and smooth far-field potential flow. Additionally, force prediction is undermined by the numerical instability of computing wall-normal velocity gradients from continuous-field approximations. Both of these points are addressed with a DD-RNO (domain-decomposed routed neural operator), combining a spectral geometry encoder with two physics-guided innovations: (a) a differentiable domain routing mechanism that partitions the flow field into inviscid, boundary-layer, and wake regimes---dispatching query points to specialized regional decoders, and (b) learned canonical quadrature (LCQ), which replaces unstable pressure integration with flow-conditioned, learned integration weights that predict lift and drag directly from surface pressure. On the AirfRANS benchmark, DD-RNO cuts velocity field mean-square error (MSE) by 17$x$ ($u_x$) and 12$x$ ($u_y$) over the strongest baseline, widening to 23$x$ under out-of-distribution Reynolds extrapolation---evidence that the routing mechanism generalizes with the physics it encodes rather than merely fitting the training distribution. LCQ reduces drag MSE by 7.5$x$ relative to conventional pressure integration and raises drag rank correlation from $\rho = 0.250$ to $\rho = 0.997$. Ablations confirm that both components are indispensable to performance: removing domain routing increases velocity error by 8.2$x$, and removing LCQ increases relative drag error more than 40-fold. At ~144 ms per sample---a 10,000$x$ speedup over conventional RANS solvers---DD-RNO offers a surrogate accurate and fast enough for real-time aerodynamic design and optimization loops.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

A fast prediction approach for airfoil flow field based on the deep neural network framework

The results show that ParaAero-Net performs effectively in small-sample aerodynamic prediction of two-dimensional airfoils and achieves good reconstruction of both flow-field structures and aerodynamic coefficients.

Jun-Qiao Wang, Chen Liu, Xu Zhan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

FSAN: Flow State Attention Network for Aerodynamic Prediction

The Flow State Attention Network (FSAN) separately encodes point cloud and flow conditions, then partitions the geometry into multiple flow states via learnable soft assignments, and uses flow features to update these state representations, which enables fine-grained, state-specific interaction between geometry and flo...

Wen-Xuan Jin, Jian-Guo Yao, Hai-Bing Guan et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Enhancing the Spalart–Allmaras Model for Transonic Airfoils Using Field Inversion/Machine Learning

Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations are widely used in industrial design due to their favorable balance between accuracy, computational cost, and turnaround time. However, RANS models often struggle to predict complex flows involving separation or strong adverse pressure gradients. In transonic flows ove...

Louis Carduner, B. Fanizza, F. Renac et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Fold-Reconstructed Sensitivity Priors and Structure-Preserving BP Neural Curves for Ducted Propeller Hydrodynamic Prediction

Rapid surrogate prediction of ducted propeller performance is challenging when only a limited number of independent geometries are available and operating points belonging to the same geometry are strongly correlated. This study proposes a sensitivity-informed physics-regularized backpropagation neural network (SIPR-BP...

Cheng-Shan Li, Jun-Xiao Liu, Xiao-Yi An et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Airfoil2Vec: Spectral Geometry-Conditioned Neural Surrogate Models for Airfoil Aerodynamics and a Downforce-Generating CFD Dataset

We introduce a dataset of approximately 10,000 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of steady, incompressible, two-dimensional subsonic flow around downforce-generating NACA 4-digit airfoils, targeting aerodynamic regimes relevant to automotive and motorsport applications (openly available on https://hugg...

Haitz Sáez de Ocáriz Borde, Flavio Savarino, A. C. Popescu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Physics-Attention Wind Noise Transformer: A Point Cloud Deep Learning Surrogate for Rapid Automotive Wind Noise Prediction

Accurate prediction of automotive aerodynamic wind noise is important for cabin comfort and early-stage styling, yet conventional CFD and wind-tunnel workflows are too expensive for rapid design iteration. This paper proposes a point cloud surrogate that combines farthest-point sampling with a Transolver-derived, physi...

Xing-Long Zhang, Zhi-Guo Zhang, Qing-Han Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.