Skip to content
Open access

Process evaluation of a nurse-led transitional care model (Cardiolotse) within a randomized controlled trial aiming to improve care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Germany

Sep 2026 · BMC Health Services Research · Vol 26 · 0 citations · 30 references
Medicine

TL;DR

An innovative care program providing post-discharge support and helping patients to navigate through the healthcare system in Germany, a nurse-led transitional care model improving care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Germany is evaluated.

Abstract

Patients with higher age suffering from cardiovascular disease discharged from hospital are at greater risk of readmission within 30 days. We evaluated an innovative care program providing post-discharge support and helping patients to navigate through the healthcare system. This paper reports the findings of the process evaluation of the randomized controlled trial Cardiolotse, a nurse-led transitional care model improving care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Germany. A process evaluation, following the guidelines of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework, was performed. Semi-structured interviews with all relevant target groups were conducted to gain more insight about implementation processes. Questionnaires and medical records were used to explore mechanisms of impact and understand how change was produced in the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis with deductive and inductive categories. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses were utilized to explore quantitative data. Overall, the designed training programme was perceived positively by the study nurses, so called Cardiolotsen (CLs). Patients receiving support by the CLs reported positive satisfaction ratings. Interactions between CLs and patients were reported as trustworthy and reliable. A total of approximately 12,500 contacts were made over the course of the intervention. However, changes in satisfaction scores between intervention and control groups in terms of medical treatment or the interaction between medical health providers involved in the treatment could not be determined. Furthermore, data suggested reach issues with respect to office-based physicians, as regular CL contact could not be achieved with 90% of the participating general practitioners and cardiologists. The CLs served as an important source of support for the participating patients throughout the intervention. At regular intervals, they checked a patient’s health status and their adherence to therapies after discharge. However, the process evaluation identified cross-sectoral communication and information exchange between CLs and office-based physicians as an implementation challenge. The study was retrospectively registered at German Clinical Trial Register, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00020424 (Trial Registration Number DRKS00020424) on 18 June 2020.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Lessons learned from a trial on integrated and proactive care for patients with complex needs (Hotspotters project): a process evaluation

Background: This study focused on adults with complex care needs due to problems on multiple life domains and consequent high acute care use. The Hotspotters Project was undertaken to assess the effects of proactive integrated care on health outcomes and healthcare costs in this group. We evaluated the reach, effective...

V. Tiemes, Minke Verdonk, Mitchel van der Wel et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Process evaluation of the randomized trial—“Care management for older people with cognitive impairment during and after hospitalisation in Germany (intersec-CM)”

Effective care of people with cognitive impairment and their families depends, among other things, on the cooperation of the professionals involved in their care. An effective dementia care management support model for people with dementia and their families for the outpatient sector has been further developed for ambu...

N. Chikhradze, A. Hannich, I. Otte et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Co-Designing a Care Transition Intervention to Improve Nurse-to-Nurse Discharge Communication for Older Adults: A Pilot Study in Ireland

Background: Effective discharge communication is critical for ensuring continuity of care for older adults transitioning from acute hospitals to Transitional Care Units (TCUs). However, documentation inconsistencies and communication gaps remain prevalent, impacting patient outcomes and care quality. This pilot study a...

Olayinka Aremu, A. Phelan · 0 citations
Oct 2026

The role of nurses in shared decision-making in primary care: Qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE To explore the primary care nursing professionals (PCN) perception of their role in Shared Decision Making (SDM) to improve the adherence in patients with chronic pathology and a new cardiovascular and/or diabetes with new pharmacological prescription. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was conducted w...

Carmen Gallardo-González, María Del Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela, C. Corral-Partearroyo et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Effectiveness of Nurse-Coordinated, Digital-Supported Collaborative Care Model in Reducing Hospital Stay and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure: TIME-HF Cluster RCT India.

BACKGROUND Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction causes high mortality and recurrent hospitalizations in India. We evaluated the effectiveness of the collaborative care model in improving days alive and out of the hospital and overall survival. METHODS We conducted a parallel-group, cluster-randomized controll...

P. Jeemon, S. Ganapathi, Navya Anikkady et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.