Oct 2026· Proceedings of the World Conference on Gender and Women's Studies· 0 citations· 114 references
Abstract
This conceptual paper offers a gender-equitable alternative to leadership discourse centered on productivity, resilience, hierarchy, and transformation. Its starting point is a systemic problem it names “workplace theater,” where organizations operate as figured worlds in which people secure legibility and advancement by performing recognized roles, and in which each fluent performance re-anchors the structures that favor the dominant category. Read systemically, this is a reinforcing feedback loop, and mainstream reform intervenes only at its weakest leverage points, including representation targets, procedural rules, and behavioral training. The framework introduced here instead targets the paradigm, the tacit and largely unstated definition of what a competent leader is, from which a system’s goals, structure, and rules arise. Gender performance is treated as the sharpest instance of this dynamic. Drawing on theories of performance and power, the paper shows how the compulsion to perform a masculine-coded ideal of authority reproduces inequity at the level of the leader’s own self-constitution. Responsible Rebellion, developed through critical-theoretical synthesis and reflective practitioner inquiry, comprises four pillars (Responsibility, Response, Reflection, and Rebellion) grounded in embodied wholeness. It moves leaders from scripted performance toward self-authored agency, replacing power-over with power-with and power-within, and reframes reinvention as a homecoming rather than a repair. The paper illustrates the pillars through two composite practice vignettes, specifies a logic model linking them to hypothesized individual, relational, and system outcomes, and states eleven testable propositions with candidate indicators and disconfirming conditions. It grounds its embodied claims in the sociology of bodily disposition and the epistemology of bodily knowing developed within leadership and organization studies, not in clinical neurophysiology, and specifies the scope conditions under which the framework is expected to hold beyond Western and Anglophone settings.
Background: Global leadership scholarship has treated the national border as a proxy for cultural complexity, which confines the field to leaders who travel. Research on organizational culture, for its part, tends to assume that culture is made by executives or by established occupational subcultures. Neither literatur...
This manuscript reconstructs adaptive leadership theory through intersectionality, Black feminist thought,
critical race theory, and Foucauldian power analysis. It argues that adaptive leadership’s central constructs,
adaptive challenge, holding environment, productive disequilibrium, balcony view, and the leadership
a...
Jeffrey G. McKinney· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEN...· 0 citations
Using a synthesis of role theory and the concept of asymmetric alliance, this article studies the transformation of Türkiye-U.S. relations during Donald Trump’s presidency. It identifies structural and ideological reasons behind the strategic alliance’s evolution into a transactional personal partnership amid role conf...
Pavel V. Shlykov· Russia in Global Affairs· 0 citations
Contemporary gender scholarship has developed powerful accounts of emancipation, recognition, intersectionality, performativity, and the regulation of gendered life. Yet a recurring theoretical problem remains: successful challenges to exclusion do not produce social spaces without norms. They alter which identities ar...
Derek Barker-Ciganik· Proceedings of the World Con...· 0 citations
This article examines how global research funding systems and institutional hierarchies continue to marginalize scholars based in the Global South (GS) within corruption studies. While the GS is frequently the site of empirical research, agenda-setting power, authorship, and legitimacy remain concentrated in the Global...
Anwesha Chakraborty, Robert Gillanders, Giovanna Rodríguez-García et al.· American Behavioral Scientis...· 0 citations
Innovation is routinely named as a determinant of HR and organizational competitiveness, yet how the employees expected to produce it read the conditions surrounding them in the workplace has attracted little scrutiny—least of all in steeply hierarchical, non‐Western workplaces. The omission matters because the domin...
Mohamed Mohiya· Systems research and behavio...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.