The AdaptSolveAI with SelfSolveNet framework provides a practical recipe for resilient and safety-aware autonomy by enabling continuous learning from unlabeled streams, adaptation within fixed computational budgets, and action execution under control barrier function-based safety constraints.
Abstract
Autonomous systems must perform safely and efficiently when deployed in the real world, where data distributions drift and no labels are available during deployment. Current approaches either assume stationarity, adapt slowly (and only through sufficiently narrow objectives), or leave learning and explicit safety uncoupled (neglecting stringent latency budgets). We present the safety-aligned, latency-bounded problem solving and continuous, label-free adaptation framework, AdaptSolveAI with SelfSolveNet. It combines a multi-objective self-supervised paradigm (contrastive, masked reconstruction, cross-modal alignment, distillation, and a head informed by the barrier), a shift-aware prioritized replay (novelty, safety margin, Fisher sensitivity), and parameter-efficient updates (adaptors/normalization/low-rank layers) under the hard constraint of a compute budget. That is, a control-barrier safety supervisor minimally corrects actions, and is given the same safety-signal used in the representation learning stage. On driving, navigation, manipulation and scheduling benchmarks with S1-S3 distribution shifts, AdaptSolveAI outperforms the strongest baseline on normalized return (0.86 ± 0.01 vs. 0.79 ± 0.02), success rate (77.9%±1.2 vs. 70.3%±1.3), and safety violations (3.9%±0.3 vs. 5.8%±0.3), while maintaining FPS (frames per second) and deadline missed (%) (≤ 1% of deadlines missed). Time-to-adapt is less (310 ± 20 vs. 520 ± 30 steps) The area under the robustness curve is also higher (0.857 vs. 0.776) under progressive camera dropout, with recovery after sensor restoration taking place faster. Abalations show the performance benefits cannot be achieved without the safety-aware and cross-modal heads, prioritized replay, and adapters. The framework provides a practical recipe for resilient and safety-aware autonomy by enabling continuous learning from unlabeled streams, adaptation within fixed computational budgets, and action execution under control barrier function-based safety constraints. It is directly applicable to embedded deployments and offers a path toward standardized evaluation and certification of learning-enabled systems.
It is shown how moving from BO to partitioning-based algorithms can substantially improve data efficiency, scale gracefully to dozens of process variables, and handle the constraints and noise that characterize realistic experimental campaigns.
N. Sahinidis· Proceedings of the 3rd Found...· 0 citations
: Self-adaptive systems (SAS) autonomously reconfigure in response to uncertain environments and evolving requirements. Two decades of research have produced a rich but fragmented body of work spanning architecture, machine learning, uncertainty management, and verification, each strand typically surveyed in isolation. This paper makes three contributions. First, it provides a critical survey, rather than a catalogue, of foundational and contemporary SAS methodologies, organized using the reporting principles of established systematic-review guidelines. Second, it introduces an original synthesizing artifact, the Adaptation–Assurance Gap Map, which positions each class of adaptation mechanism (rule-based, control-theoretic, search-based, model-based, reinforcement learning, deep predictive, federated, and LLM-assisted) against the maturity of assurance evidence routinely available for it, exposing systematically under-assured combinations. The map is governed by an explicit rating rubric, complemented by a technique-maturity model that includes an assurance-cost dimen-sion. Third, it positions the framework against prior SAS taxonomies and converts the findings into a gap-to-research traceability matrix with concrete, falsifiable directions. Using exemplars (DeltaIoT, SWIM, and an ML-component retraining case), we show that the field’s principal weakness is not a shortage of adaptation mechanisms but a shortage of assurance that scales with them in scope, tempo, and cost.
Kashif Manzer, Dipak Yadav, M. Rahim· Proceedings of the 21st Inte...· 0 citations
Ensuring safety constraint satisfaction in non-stationary Reinforcement Learning (RL) environments remains a major challenge, as distribution drift can quickly invalidate previously calibrated risk estimates. To address this issue, we propose DynBudget, a closed-loop Safe RL framework integrating a learned safety critic, temperature-calibrated risk estimation, and a dynamic safety budget. By jointly adjusting the calibration temperature and the intervention threshold based on real-time violation feedback, the safety shield enables rapid adaptation to environmental drifts. We carried out experiments in two stages to fully evaluate the adaptation mechanism as well as the practical robustness of DynBudget. First, we studied the framework in a number of discrete MiniGrid contexts, and then we tested it on various continuous robotic tasks in Safety-Gymnasium. Our empirical results indicate that our approach is able to effectively reduce safety violations, shorten recovery time after a drift, and preserve competitive task performance when faced with abrupt changes in hazards or physical perturbations. Finally, we show that shielding with dynamic budgets is an interpretable and viable approach to Safe RL in autonomous systems.
Delta (Differential Testing for DRL Agents) is proposed, a novel and comprehensive framework that automatically identifies both safety-critical and optimality bugs in DRL agents and investigates the effectiveness of three offline RL algorithms in generating challenger agents.
Junda He, Jieke Shi, Zhou Yang et al.· 0 citations
HYPER-GNC, a multi-task reinforcement learning framework in which a hypernetwork maps physics-informed task embeddings to the weights of a shared actor-critic policy, enabling a single compact controller to master four distinct GNC tasks: velocity tracking, docking, inspection, and navigation with obstacle avoidance.
Ricard M. Castan, Aman Arora, Antoine Richard et al.· 0 citations