METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING AN ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF SECURITY ECONOMICS

Abstract

The operation of construction enterprises amid growing economic uncertainty and the simultaneous impact of financial, investment, technological, organizational and security threats necessitates a revision of the way anti-crisis management is organized. High capital intensity, long project cycles and the large number of interdependent participants make such enterprises particularly sensitive to crisis factors, while conventional mechanisms aimed at eliminating consequences already incurred do not provide the required level of economic resilience. The purpose of the article is to determine how a system of anti-crisis management of a construction enterprise can be built in which the functional subsystems are combined on the principles of security economics, and by which indicators the coherence of such a system can be measured. The methodological framework combines systemic, integrative, process, adaptive and risk-oriented approaches together with normalization, weighted aggregation and multiplicative convolution of indicators. The fundamental principles of the system are identified as systemicity, adaptability, preventiveness, integration and continuity of management processes. A multi-level architecture of economic security is substantiated, encompassing the information and analytical, financial and economic, production and technological, organizational and strategic levels, within which strategic planning, risk management, economic diagnostics, digital analytics and resource provision are integrated into a unified management environment. An organizational and economic mechanism of crisis risk management is formed, whose functional blocks cover analytical, economic, organizational, control and strategic tasks. A methodological toolkit for integrated assessment is developed, comprising indicators of architectural coherence, functional performance, organizational and economic balance, mechanism adaptability, risk management effectiveness and crisis resilience. Unlike additive schemes, the multiplicative convolution reveals disproportions between components instead of levelling them, allowing the least developed element to be identified. The practical value lies in applying the toolkit to diagnose crisis resilience and adjust management decisions.