Oct 2026· International Journal of Cardiology· Vol 466, pp.
134993
· 0 citations· 73 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The updated COVADIS criteria for microvascular angina incorporate new suggestions for endotype definitions based on the invasive assessment of coronary physiology including coronary flow reserve and the index of microvascular resistance during pharmacological stress as well as acetylcholine testing for epicardial and/or microvascular spasm.
Abstract
Microvascular angina, in the context of ischemia with non-obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA), is a highly prevalent clinical condition in cardiovascular medicine. Although it remains frequently underdiagnosed, clinical research and practice have made substantial progress in the last 10 years. This includes better characterisation of affected patient cohorts, new data on the prevalence of coronary vasomotor disorders and improved diagnostic assessments (non-invasive and invasive). The aim of this paper is to update our previous 2018 recommendations for the standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. The updated COVADIS (Coronary Vasomotor Disorders Study Group) criteria focus on the following 4 criteria: (1) symptoms of myocardial ischemia; (2) non-obstructive coronary disease (stenosis <50%); (3) objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and (4) evidence of impaired coronary microvascular function. The updated criteria incorporate new suggestions for endotype definitions based on the invasive assessment of coronary physiology including coronary flow reserve and the index of microvascular resistance during pharmacological stress as well as acetylcholine testing for epicardial and/or microvascular spasm. The updated criteria should contribute to improved recognition and better management of this condition.
The Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study group (COVADIS) developed the diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina and microvascular angina more than 8 years ago. This article critically reappraises these criteria (Latin: quid fecisti - what has been done) and proposes the strategies for their advancement (L...
John F. Beltrame, Peter Ong, C. Berry et al.· Heart, Lung and Circulation· 0 citations
Background Patients with Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA) experience recurrent angina, report reduced quality of life, and are at increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. Unfortunately, INOCA is often unrecognized and can be difficult to diagnose. Methods We included patients with an...
Angela Wang, Rose Huang, Yvonne Shea et al.· Frontiers in Cardiovascular...· 0 citations
Despite major advances in cardiovascular medicine, ischemic heart disease (IHD) in women remains underrecognized and undertreated. A substantial proportion of symptomatic women have no flow-limiting epicardial stenosis, and ischemia may arise from coronary microvascular dysfunction, vasospasm, diffuse atherosclerosis,...
C. Tognola, R. Intravaia, G. Colombo et al.· Cardiovascular Medicine· 0 citations
Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Coronary angiography (CAG) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease, but it is invasive and costly. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is cheap, safe and widely available, yet its diagnostic performance varies across populations...
Umar Farooq, Sheeraz Ahmed, M. Shad· Journal of Pharma and Biomed...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
There is little information regarding the characteristics of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in terms of coronary endothelial function and prognosis, as compared to patients with angina and non-obstructive coronaries (ANOCA). We assessed differences in clin...
Álvaro Gabaldón-Badiola, Jorge Ruíz Esquivel, Eva Rúmiz et al.· International Journal of Car...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.