The Impact of Community Engagement with Vaccine-Hesitant Persons During the COVID-19 Pandemic
TL;DR
The design of the community meetings to focus on learning from and supporting the decision-maker (versus only promoting “shots in arms”) improved health outcomes and increased trust and could improve how public health engages communities.
Abstract
Introduction: Community engagement offers an approach to improve our understanding of vaccine hesitancy, yet some worry that public engagement centered around controversial and politicized topics such as COVID-19 vaccines carries a risk of increasing concerns. Methods: Respondents who reported hesitance to vaccinate against COVID-19 in a December 2020 national panel survey were recruited to participate in three interactive and respectful virtual community engagement meetings. A second survey in September 2021 resampled respondents to ascertain changes over time. Of the 291 respondents to both survey waves who had been willing to participate in community meetings, 94 (32%) participated. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to assess the potential impact of meeting participation on outcomes of interest. Results: At follow-up, participants had nearly double the odds of vaccinating against COVID-19 (adjusted Odds Ratio: 1.88; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.06–3.34), about one-third the odds of contracting COVID-19 disease (aOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.14–0.96), and increased trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (adjusted Regression Coefficient: 4.16; 95% CI: 0.37–7.94), compared to non-participants. Most participants found the meetings unbiased (89%) and trustworthy (90%). Conclusions: The design of our community meetings to focus on learning from and supporting the decision-maker (versus only promoting “shots in arms”) improved health outcomes and increased trust. Similar meetings could improve how public health engages communities.