GEM is presented, a generative embedding model that augments retrieval through its own knowledge by explicitly reasoning about user intent and relevance criteria, and its generative nature allows test-time compute scaling via prompting to further enhance retrieval performance.
Abstract
Modern LLMs excel at reasoning and instruction following, enabling users to express complex and diverse information needs. However, conventional retrievers largely rely on surface-level matching between queries and documents, resulting in a growing gap between how users express their needs and how retrievers interpret them. In this paper, we present GEM, a generative embedding model that augments retrieval through its own knowledge by explicitly reasoning about user intent and relevance criteria. GEM unifies generation and embedding within a single model: it first reasons over the query, then appends an embedding token to encode the enriched context for retrieval. Evaluated on reasoning-intensive and instruction-following retrieval tasks, GEM demonstrates the effectiveness of its reasoning-augmented retrieval, outperforming its non-reasoning variant and matching baselines using substantially larger models. Furthermore, GEM's generative nature allows test-time compute scaling via prompting to further enhance retrieval performance. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GEM.
ConRAG is proposed, a novel enhanced RAG framework to establish an information connection between retrievers and LLMs in RAG, thereby enhancing relationship modeling of LLMs and is suitable for low-resource scenarios where LLMs and retrievers are frozen.
Fu-Da Ye, Shuang-Yin Li, Yong-Qi Zhang et al.· ACM Transactions on Knowledg...· 0 citations
This work introduces Retrieval-Aware Self-Distillation (RASD), which extracts privileged guidance from input-supported facts and evidence distinguishing the positive from hard negatives, and Retrieval-Adaptive Inference (RAI), which learns a retrieval-aware stopping criterion from prefix-level retrieval feedback.
Ming-Zhou Jiang, Pei-Xi Wu, Hang Cheng et al.· 0 citations
The results demonstrate that retrieval quality acts as a rigid performance ceiling for generative correctness and suggest that for RAG applications, strategic database indexing is a more critical performance lever than embedding parameter scale: architectural retrieval decisions matter more than model size.
Assmaa Moutaoukkil, A. El Mezouary, A. Idarrou et al.· EPJ Web of Conferences· 0 citations
UnicDocVLM is proposed, an end-to-end framework that unifies OCR and visual RAG within a single vision-language model: the model first generates a structured parse of retrieved pages, then activates question-relevant evidence from the parse to support grounded reasoning and answering.
Zong-Sheng Cao, Anran Liu, Jun Xie et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This work proposes SHIFT, a retrieval training framework based on LLMs that transfers LLMs into reasoning-efficient retrievers with residual projection and task-oriented bidirectional attention aggregation in the latent space, and alleviates the mismatch between contrastive learning and implicit reasoning using fine-gr...
Yuxiao Luo, Da Li, Mingjie Zhang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Although multi-turn inference remains more expensive than single-call retrieval, VecTree-RAG provides a structure-aware and traceable architecture for scientific literature question answering.