This work presents GraftyVul, a system that constructs vulnerable programs by grafting real-world vulnerabilities into open-source projects, and introduces a language- and context-agnostic semantic embedding that compares vulnerabilities by sink, mechanism and host-feature rather than surface code.
Abstract
Vulnerability datasets underpin a wide range of security research, including vulnerability detection, automated remediation, and secure code generation. However, existing datasets sacrifice at least one of three desirable properties: diversity (of language or vulnerability type), reproducibility/executability, or realism. We therefore present GraftyVul, a system that constructs vulnerable programs by grafting real-world vulnerabilities into open-source projects. This grounds the dataset in vulnerabilities observed in real-world contexts while harnessing known good build and test environments, enabling exploit-verification scripts to guarantee that an introduced vulnerability successfully alters a program's behaviour. Using GraftyVul, we generate 212 verified and exploitable vulnerable programs spanning five programming languages (Python, TypeScript, Java, Go, and C#) across 23 CWE categories. To evaluate fidelity, we introduce a language- and context-agnostic semantic embedding that compares vulnerabilities by sink, mechanism and host-feature rather than surface code. This approach outperforms standard code embeddings on cross-language clone and CWE classification. These embeddings demonstrate that GraftyVul samples retain a strong semantic signature to their source vulnerability. We additionally compare GraftyVul against 13 widely used datasets, where it attains competitive diversity while being the only reproducible-exploit dataset with broad language and CWE coverage. Finally, we illustrate GraftyVul's practical utility through an industrial case study evaluating a production vulnerability remediation system.
A dual-stream CodeBERT architecture is presented that addresses keyword bias —by combining pre-trained Transformer representations with a 50-dimensional hand-engineered security feature vector, supported by targeted data augmentation and two-stage adversarial fine-tuning.
Arjun Khurana, Talaya Farasat, Joachim Posegga et al.· 0 citations
Despite the dominance of Transformer-based models in software vulnerability detection, the extent to which their learned security logic generalizes across different programming languages remains a critical open question. To address this, we propose a comprehensive evaluation framework organized into three phases spanni...
Nhien Huu Dinh, Chau The, Thai Hung Van et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
: Large language models are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical domains, yet remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that circumvent safety alignments. This systematic review synthesizes empirical jailbreak research published between 2024 and 2025, using a PRISMA-guided search protocol, followed by BERTopic-b...
Meda Račaitytė, Hélder Bastos, R. Ribeiro et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
VICBench enables robust evaluation of vulnerability detection approaches and shows that state-of-the-art algorithms V-SZZ and LLM4SZZ achieve only 33.3%-40.1% F1, confirming that using existing approaches still entails significant manual effort.
Jin Lu, Xuening Han, Yan Zhong et al.· 0 citations
AlIBI is presented, an automated adaptive black-box attack framework that generates and iteratively refines adversarial comments using detector reasoning and feedback and is motivated to motivate security-aware designs that carefully calibrate trust between natural-language context and program evidence.
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in code-related tasks, however their effectiveness in software vulnerability detection (SVD) remains poorly understood due to inadequate evaluation frameworks. Existing benchmarks suffer from training data contamination, isolated function evaluation without c...
Arastoo Zibaeirad, Rodrigo Pato Nogueira, Marco Vieira· IEEE Transactions on Reliabi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.