Aug 2026· Nature Communications· Vol 17· 0 citations· 29 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This Swedish population study reveals that healthy vaccinee bias inflates estimates of the effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines in adults aged 65 years or older, highlighting the need to account for frailty and overall health status.
Abstract
Established determinants of health in the elderly help guide routines for indicated vaccine administration, while unmeasured frailty may limit vaccine access. We evaluate the performance of the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine adapted to the Omicron JN.1 lineage in a Swedish population aged ≥65 years (N = 245 696). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) on COVID-19-related hospitalization and a negative control outcome (NCO; all-cause mortality) are assessed in various cohorts between October 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025. The VE was 75% (95% CI 70%–79%) overall, and 84% (95% CI 80%–87%) and 65% (95% CI 34%–82%) in individuals with and without vaccination with the prior updated COVID-19 vaccine in 2023-2024, respectively. The NCO in individuals exposed to the study vaccine in 2024-2025 was half of that seen in those not exposed to the vaccine (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.40–0.45]). Removing individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 from this population did not change the difference in NCO (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.41-0.46]). These findings suggest the presence of selection effects arising from under-provision of health services to elderly individuals with frailty. The healthy vaccinee effect should be considered in observational studies of the effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines in elderly populations. This Swedish population study reveals that healthy vaccinee bias inflates estimates of the effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines in adults aged 65 years or older, highlighting the need to account for frailty and overall health status.
A pronounced HVE was observed for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during the pandemic, evidenced by markedly lower mortality from causes not plausibly related to vaccination (cancer, external causes) among vaccinated individuals.
U. Riedmann, H. Brenner, J. Ioannidis et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Background In 2025, COVID-19 vaccination programmes in England targeted adults aged [≥]75 years and immunosuppressed individuals, with JN.1-based vaccines offered in spring and KP.2-based vaccines offered in autumn. This study evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalisation following these campaig...
N. A. Aziz, A. Allen, N. Andrews· medRxiv· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
This study evaluated the potential public health impact of receiving Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, LP.8.1, 2025-2026 formula, in the US pediatric population aged 5-17 years at high risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A previously published static decision-tree model was...
A. Yehoshua, M. di Fusco, Abby E. Rudolph et al.· Expert Review of Vaccines· 0 citations
In this population-based cohort, completion of the 3-dose BNT162b2 primary series was associated with substantially lower rates of COVID-19-attributed SARI among children aged 6 months to 4 years.
I. N. Schrarstzhaupt, F. A. Diaz-Quijano· Vaccine· 0 citations
Overall rollout in LMICs may avert a portion of symptomatic TB cases and TB-associated deaths, and in some countries could be cost-effective/saving, and in some countries could be cost-effective/saving.
R. Clark, A. Portnoy, T. Sumner et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
The strong association of mortality with mechanical ventilation and social determinants highlights the need for timely boosters and comprehensive preventive strategies for this vulnerable population of immunocompromised older adults.
R. D. de Rezende, J. F. Pimentel, Bruno Santos Caxias et al.· Revista brasileira de epidem...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.