The findings highlight that adolescent vaccination impact depends on the timing/speed of implementation, other present intervention strategies, and the status of the epidemic at the time and it should not be considered as a stand-alone immunisation strategy.
Abstract
Background/Objectives We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 adolescent vaccination in England at two different epidemic points: the autumn (August-November) 2021, in the presence of a large Omicron epidemic wave, and the autumn (August-November) 2022, when the subsequent Omicron epidemic was at an endemic stage. Methods Using the Covasim SARS-CoV-2 model for England, under varying vaccine uptake and onset time, we evaluated the impact of a)vaccinating 18+ only versus additional 12+ vaccination from the autumn 2021; and b)the current immunisation strategy at the time versus additional 12+ vaccination from September 2022, projecting the number of new daily SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalisations and deaths. Results In presence of the BA.1 Omicron wave in late 2021, the expanded adolescent vaccination averted ~3,000,000 cases across all-ages, ~1,010,000 SARS-CoV-2 infections in the period 2-6 months from vaccine onset in the vaccinated cohort. During the Omicron waves in 2022, additional adolescents vaccination did not significantly reduce the COVID-19 burden in the entire population, nor within the vaccinated cohort. Conclusions Our findings highlight that adolescent vaccination impact depends on the timing/speed of implementation, other present intervention strategies, and the status of the epidemic at the time and it should not be considered as a stand-alone immunisation strategy.
Background In 2025, COVID-19 vaccination programmes in England targeted adults aged [≥]75 years and immunosuppressed individuals, with JN.1-based vaccines offered in spring and KP.2-based vaccines offered in autumn. This study evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalisation following these campaig...
N. A. Aziz, A. Allen, N. Andrews· medRxiv· 0 citations
A lower likelihood of subsequent COVID-19 booster uptake after experiencing systemic AE, particularly when severe or prolonged, or when experiencing a severe local AE is found, underscore the need to address experienced AE in communication strategies, as this may influence the success of vaccination campaigns.
Anne J. Huiberts, Maud M J Smits, C. Hoeve et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
Changes in routine adult vaccination across the COVID-19 pandemic period in Istanbul primary care were vaccine-specific: pneumococcal vaccination surged then declined; Td vaccination showed continued post-pandemic decline.
Begüm Yıldırım Erence, Feyzanur Erdem, Ebru Tepe et al.· Vaccines· 0 citations
People with a migration background have experienced a high burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease progression. Promoting vaccination uptake among these groups is crucial, however, in many areas, uptake has remained unevaluated. This study explored the association between migration background and first-...
Sophie L. Campman, M. D. Lasheras Carbajo, Anders Boyd et al.· BMC Public Health· 0 citations
In the early stage of rollout, higher maternal mortality was associated with lower coverage, while a larger urban population was associated with higher coverage, while a larger health expenditure and a larger urban population were associated with higher coverage.
H.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Huang, T. McAndrew· medRxiv· 0 citations
Within the domain of documented infection, the early vaccination-associated advantage attenuated substantially within months and was further reduced when prior-infection history and vaccination-stratified testing were incorporated; in the latter analysis, the contrast reversed by late 2021 and remained negative thereaf...
Y. Ophir, G. Sevillya· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.