Skip to content
Review Open access

Beyond Corticosteroids and Azathioprine: Emerging Treatment Options in Autoimmune Hepatitis — A Literature Review

Aug 2026 · Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic inflammatory liver disease with a global pooled prevalence of 15.65 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and rising incidence. First-line corticosteroids and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil induce remission in most patients, some fail to respond, relapse after treatment withdrawal, or experience treatment-limiting adverse effects. Aim: To evaluate the evidence for alternatives to standard therapy and compare their efficacy, safety, and current place in clinical practice. Methods: PubMed and PubMed Central were searched for studies published 2006–2026, prioritising systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials, and comparative cohort studies; case series were included only where stronger evidence was unavailable. The 2025 EASL guideline was reviewed. Results: Budesonide with azathioprine is supported by a multicentre randomised trial (n = 208) and meta-analytic data showing fewer steroid-related adverse effects, although its remission advantage is inconsistent across study designs. Mycophenolate mofetil achieved higher remission than azathioprine in the only randomised induction comparison (56.4% vs. 29.0% at 24 weeks; n = 70), and EASL now recognises it as a first-line alternative. Three meta-analyses consistently found better tolerability but reached different conclusions regarding remission advantage. Tacrolimus achieved 66% pooled second-line remission versus 56% for mycophenolate mofetil, on predominantly retrospective evidence. Evidence for mTOR inhibitors and biological agents is limited to small case series. Conclusion: Confidence is highest for the tolerability advantages of budesonide and mycophenolate mofetil and lower for their comparative efficacy; it is low to moderate for tacrolimus and low for mTOR inhibitors and biological agents. Third- and later-line treatment should remain individualised pending randomised comparative studies.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.