Skip to content

Design and Application of “AI Art Mentor,” a Generative AI-Based Tool to Support Personalized Feedback in Art Classes

Sep 2026 · KOREA ART EDUCATION ASSOCIATION · Vol 40, pp. 1-32 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Generative AI–based personalized feedback is conceptualized as a structure responsive to instructional context and students’ current performance and as a process that supports students’ comparison, judgment, and decisions about subsequent artistic expression.

Abstract

This study aimed to design and implement a generative AI–based “AI Art Mentor” to support personalized feedback in art classes and to examine how students interpreted and used AI feedback in relation to their artworks and creative processes. Using Google Gemini’s Gem feature, the AI Art Mentor was configured to align feedback with instructional goals, activity characteristics, students’ current artworks, and stages of production. Data from 90 seventh-grade students, including reflective journals, artworks, AI interaction records, and interviews with five students, were analyzed. The findings showed that students compared AI feedback with their own artworks and judged the appropriateness of suggestions based on their expressive intentions and artwork characteristics. They selectively drew on relevant suggestions or maintained their existing expressions, and some follow-up artworks showed related changes. Students also experienced difficulties translating feedback into material execution and expressed a need for additional support with materials and artistic techniques. This study contributes to art education by conceptualizing generative AI–based personalized feedback as a structure responsive to instructional context and students’ current performance and as a process that supports students’ comparison, judgment, and decisions about subsequent artistic expression.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Students’ Generative AI Use in Studio-Based Design Education: Selective Use, Design Judgment, and Studio Context

Students’ selective and context-dependent AI use can be interpreted as boundary-setting around when and how AI participates in the design process, and value is suggested in a judgment-centered, process-based approach to AI pedagogy that emphasizes accountability and reflective decision-making.

M. B. Huh, Alp Tural, Elif Tural · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Knotworking With Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of Emergent Student User-Experience Composition With AI-Assisted Cocreation

This case study examines how technical communication students used generative artificial intelligence in user-experience (UX) design via Figma over a semester, and investigates how students articulate GenAI as object, tool, genre, text, and person.

Gustav Verhulsdonck, Jia-Lei Jiang · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Generative AI-supported Project-based Learning in Design Education: Effects on Creative Thinking, Student Engagement, and AI Literacy

Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) into Project-Based Learning (PjBL) provides new approaches to foster students’ Creative Thinking (CT) in solving real-world design problems. However, empirical evidence on its impact, particularly on CT, student engagement, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy,...

Zhao-Di Li, Jirarat Sitthiworachart, Mike Joy · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An inquiry-based model to support writing instruction in the context of generative AI

Within a university writing instruction context, generative AI (gen AI) is changing how writing is learned, demonstrating positive impact potential through boosting learners’ motivation, automating instructional tasks, and offering instantaneous, personalised feedback. As a result, these are times of unprecedented oppo...

R. Donnelly, Ita Kennelly · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Oct 2026

Discernment in generative AI assisted instructional design: An evaluation map and design heuristics for learning experience designers

Existing research shows that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increases instructional design efficiency. However, there are concerns about pedagogical quality, accuracy and content bias. While prior studies address student passivity in evaluating AI content, the potential for designers to be passive in creati...

Salil Sahadevan, Elizabeth Jacob, Manojkrishnan Champettil et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Python to Generative AI: An Exploratory Course-Based Study Developing the INSPIRE Framework for Creativity and Professional Readiness in Computing Education

This exploratory study examines the implementation of a GenAI-supported curriculum redesign in a project-based multimedia computing course by comparing students’ experiences in Python-based and GenAI-supported production pathways in relation to creativity, applied digital competence, and perceived professional readines...

Doaa Sinnari · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.