Evaluation of the impact of virtual reality as a non-pharmacological intervention for pain and anxiety during hematology procedures and chemotherapy: a controlled trial
Virtual Reality effectiveness was demonstrated in reducing pain and anxiety during painful procedures and it was effective in reducing anxiety during CT.
Abstract
Abstract Aim This study aims to assess the efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) during painful procedures and chemotherapy (CT) in reducing pain and anxiety for patients with hematologic malignancies. Materials and methods A crossover design with an external control group was carried out. Participants were assigned to two groups: an intervention group, with a crossover design (n patients/procedures = 112), where patients underwent the procedure with standard care only, followed by washout period, then underwent the same procedure with VR. An external control group (n patients = 94, n procedures = 101) was matched to the intervention group based on age and procedure type. Pain and anxiety were assessed subjectively before and after the procedure, with intra-individual and intergroups comparisons. Side effects were captured objectively. Results A total of 206 participants were included in this study, with a total of 213 invasive procedures. Anxiety and pain decreased more during VR period than the without VR period and external control group. VR was effective in anxiety and pain reduction during all procedure, except pain during CT (p > 0.05). Two side effects (1.8%) related to intervention were reported. Conclusion VR effectiveness was demonstrated in reducing pain and anxiety during painful procedures. It was effective in reducing anxiety during CT. Clinical trial registration [ClinicalTrials.gov] identifier is [NCT07085065]
BACKGROUND
The medical environment can generate stressful and anxiety-provoking situations for patients, particularly during painful care procedures on the older population. These stressful conditions have negative effects on the quality of care and can even put the patient at risk and set the care team up for failure....
Camille Corbel, F. Le Cerf, Françoise Capriz et al.· Contemporary Clinical Trials· 0 citations
Both VR and therapeutic touch were associated with lower pain and anxiety during emergency suturing than standard care, and VR appeared to provide an additional advantage over therapeutic touch for reducing anxiety, but not pain.
Tooba Khajehhasani-Rabori, Saiedeh Haji-Maghsoudi, Rabori Mehdipour-Rabori· International Journal of Eme...· 0 citations
Virtual reality hypnosis is a feasible and safe alternative to IVS for PAC placement under local anesthesia in oncology patients and may become essential in clinical practice by avoiding the potential side effects associated with pharmacological sedation while ensuring a similar patient experience.
Virginie van Boeckel, C. Kestens, Claudia Charry et al.· Revue Medicale de Liege· 0 citations
Findings support VR as a promising non-pharmacological adjunct for reducing procedural pain, fear, and anxiety in school-age children undergoing venipuncture and confirm in larger, multicenter trials involving more diverse pediatric populations are needed before routine incorporation into pediatric care can be recommen...
BACKGROUND/SIGNIFICANCE
Breast biopsies are essential for cancer diagnoses and are often accompanied by heightened procedural anxiety. While local anesthesia addresses procedural pain, it does not lessen psychological distress. Virtual reality (VR) has been explored as a distraction-based intervention that may reduce p...
Renee Trambert, P. Friedman, Naveed Jan et al.· Worldviews on Evidence-Based...· 0 citations
Current evidence is insufficient to support a definitive clinical benefit of VR intervention in alleviating anxiety and pain among patients undergoing TIVAP implantation.
Qing-Qing Zhu, Wei Xie, Yuan-Qian Luo et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.