Skip to content
Preprint

Difference-in-Differences for Heterogeneous Effects of General Treatment Strategies Accounting for Time-Varying Covariates

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 41 references
Mathematics

Abstract

We introduce a class of marginal Structural Nested Mean Models (mSNMMs) that enable modeling time-varying effect modification by a subset of covariates required as adjustment variables. We focus on identifiability and estimation under conditional parallel trends assumptions, so mSNMMs are applicable in settings where time-varying Difference-in-Differences (DiD) methods are typically applied. Modeling effect modification by lower dimensional covariates reduces the risk of model misspecification and can improve interpretability relative to previously developed `full SNMMs'. mSNMMs enjoy two key advantages over alternative time-varying DiD methods. First, the parallel trends assumptions that they require are more plausible in the presence of time-varying confounding. Second, they are able to model effects of \textit{sustained} interventions even when treatment switches on and off in the data. We illustrate the methodology by applying mSNMMs to estimate how the effects of Medicaid expansion (a time-varying treatment) on local uninsurance rates vary with unemployment rate prior to expansion (a time-varying covariate), adjusting for additional time-varying demographic and economic variables.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

Testing Treatment Effect Heterogeneity with Functional Outcomes

Assessing treatment-effect heterogeneity is important in causal inference, particularly for functional outcomes where effects may vary over time and the common effect is unknown. We propose a nonparametric procedure that assesses treatment-effect homogeneity through a testable marginal implication. By comparing within-...

Yong-Zhen Feng, Jie Li, Xiao-Jun Song · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Omitted Variable Bias in Difference-in-Differences Designs

We study the omitted variable bias (OVB) problem in canonical difference-in-differences (DiD) designs when unobserved confounding induces departures from the parallel trends assumption. Our results provide a novel characterization of the OVB formula for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), which is of ind...

Jue-Jue Wang, Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna, V. Chernozhukov et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Causal Inference under Dynamic Selection and Latent Heterogeneity

I study dynamic treatment effects in panel data under staggered adoption when treatment timing depends jointly on unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity and time-varying pretreatment covariates, including lagged outcomes. Untreated potential outcomes follow a nonparametric dynamic panel model that allows flexible inte...

Wei-Sheng Zhang · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

When Can We Use Two-Way Fixed Effects (TWFE)? A Comparison of TWFE and Novel Dynamic Difference-in-Differences Estimators

The conventional two-way fixed effects (TWFE) estimator has come under increasing scrutiny in settings with staggered treatment adoption. Recent research shows that TWFE can be biased when treatment effects vary across time or groups, prompting the development of several alternative dynamic difference-in-differences (D...

Tobias Rüttenauer, O. Aksoy · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

An Averaging Alternative to Pre-Trend Testing

We study difference-in-differences (DID) estimation of average treatment effects on the treated when the researcher is uncertain about which pre-treatment periods satisfy the parallel trends assumption. Roth (2022) shows that pre-trend testing can induce bias, complementing the statistical literature on post-selection...

Nicholas L. Brown, Qiu-Shi Bu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Controlled interrupted time series, segmented regression and difference-in-difference: a guide bridging econometric terminology for public health researchers.

While econometrics and statistics drove modern quasi-experimental methods for causal inference in policy evaluation, public health frequently adopts such tools to evaluate health interventions when randomised controlled trials are not feasible. However, public health researchers unfamiliar with the causal inference lit...

F. Manca, N. Sheikh, D. Mackay et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.