Fire-Related Smoke Inhalation Injury as an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Hospitalized Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Adjusted Estimates
Background: Smoke inhalation injury is the main fire-related respiratory injury in burn patients and is included in most burn mortality scores, but whether it predicts death independently of burn size and age has been disputed. Objective: To estimate the multivariable-adjusted association between inhalation injury and mortality in hospitalized burn patients and the attenuation produced by adjustment. Methods: PubMed, Europe PMC, OpenAlex and Scopus were searched without date or language limits, with citation searching. Cohort studies reporting an adjusted estimate for inhalation injury were included. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled with random-effects models (DerSimonian–Laird, Hartung–Knapp); risk of bias was assessed with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool and certainty with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The protocol was not registered. Results: 53 cohorts (338,479 patients, 28 countries) were included. The pooled adjusted OR from 44 cohorts was 3.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.67–3.90) (I² 72.3%; 95% prediction interval 1.43–7.30); adjusted hazard ratios gave 2.46 (1.45–4.19) (7 cohorts). The crude OR was 9.45 (6.40–13.95). In 23 cohorts reporting both, adjustment reduced the OR from 9.61 to 2.92. Estimates were similar in high-income (3.20) and low- and middle-income countries (3.38; p = 0.76). No small-study effects were found (Egger p = 0.93); certainty was moderate. Conclusion: Inhalation injury was associated with about threefold higher adjusted odds of death after burns, a smaller association than crude comparisons suggest. It should remain a core element of early burn triage and risk adjustment, including where bronchoscopic confirmation is unavailable.
Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...
O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al.· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 465 citations
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.