Sep 2026· Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics· 0 citations· 32 references
Abstract
This study examines determinants of inter‐organizational collaboration in social economy organizations through a triple bottom line framework. Using data from 2002 Spanish organizations participating in REAS social balance sheet (2019–2024), we employ generalized linear mixed models to analyse how economic, social and environmental factors influence collaborative propensity. Results reveal balanced contributions from all three dimensions. Counterintuitively, organizations with lower market orientation exhibit a higher collaborative propensity, suggesting that grant‐dependent entities are more embedded in collaborative networks than market‐oriented ones. This challenges assumptions about financial autonomy as prerequisite for collaboration. In the social dimension, dignified working conditions emerge as a predictor, alongside complex gender dynamics in which workforce composition and leadership positions operate in opposite directions. In the environmental dimension, sustainability commitment shows limited independent explanatory power but becomes broadly comparable to the other dimensions within the integrated model, suggesting it acts as a contextual amplifier rather than an independent driver of collaboration. Contrary to meta‐organization theory, tenure in collective accountability tools shows no moderating effects. However, contextual factors, particularly legal form, significantly influence collaborative patterns, with cooperatives and non‐profits demonstrating a higher propensity than commercial organizations.
Abstract Cooperatives combine economic activity with democratic ownership and member participation, yet explanations of their performance have focused predominantly on internal organizational characteristics. This paper argues that such approaches are incomplete because cooperative outcomes are also shaped by the insti...
Francesca Gagliardi· Zeitschrift für das gesamte...· 0 citations
It is argued that platforms’ informational advantage over workers, especially with their capacity to dynamically reconfigure rules in real time, constitutes a distinctive form of platform power that calls for scholarly attention.
Zi-Ying Wang, Sheng Xiao, Jiajun Bie et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on Hu...· 0 citations
Although the literature on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) increasingly recognizes the coexistence of multiple theoretical frameworks at the organizational level, little is known about how individual professionals internalize and combine these frameworks in managerial practice. This study fills this gap by anal...
I. D'Adamo, Simone Di Leo, Chiara Grosso· Corporate Social Responsibil...· 0 citations
Governance research shows that cooperation can persist despite dysfunctional state institutions, often through trust‐based mechanisms. This paper extends these debates by examining a complex collective action problem: the engagement of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) in vocational education and training (V...
Linda Wanklin· Regulation & Governance· 0 citations
This study investigates the dynamic interrelationships among the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) pillars and examines whether these dimensions operate independently or influence one another over time. Drawing on panel data from 329 companies across 20 industries over 10 years, the study employs a Panel Ve...
S. R. Rithi, Avanish Kumar· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
The circular economy (CE) substitutes the linear take-make-dispose approach with reduction, reuse, recycling and recovery of materials across production, distribution and consumption. Although existing studies have advanced CE largely through its environmental and economic dimensions, comparatively less emphasis ha...
Charles Baah, Ebenezer Afum, Douglas Opoku Agyeman· Journal of Trade Science· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.