Skip to content
Open access

Motor Cortex rTMS Alleviates Pain and Comorbid Depression After Spinal Cord Injury with a Correlate in M1 Intracortical Inhibition

Sep 2026 · Journal of Pain Research · Vol 19 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Neuropathic pain (NP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating syndrome, yet current treatments demonstrate limited efficacy. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study investigated the analgesic efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left primary motor cortex (M1) and its neurophysiological mechanisms. Patients and Methods Twenty-nine SCI patients with NP were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive either active rTMS (10 Hz, a total of 1200 pulses at an intensity of 80% resting motor threshold) or sham rTMS over the left M1 corresponding to the hand area once daily for two weeks. Pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9), and anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire, GAD-7) were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Furthermore, M1 intracortical excitability parameters, including short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), were measured using paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS). Results After the two-week intervention, active rTMS significantly reduced NRS scores (P < 0.001), PHQ-9 scores (P = 0.023), and GAD-7 scores (P = 0.002), and significantly increased both SICI and ICF values (P < 0.001 for both). Interestingly, the baseline NRS scores were correlated with the PHQ-9 scores (r = 0.392, P = 0.032) and the SICI values (r = −0.458, P = 0.017), and changes in the NRS scores correlated with changes in the PHQ-9 scores (r = 0.436, P = 0.025) and the SICI values (r = −0.571, P = 0.004). Conclusion These findings indicate that high-frequency rTMS alleviates NP and comorbid depression after SCI and is accompanied by changes in M1 intracortical inhibition. However, the 3:1 allocation resulted in a small sham group and limited statistical power for between-group comparisons, and confirmation in larger trials is required.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.