Aug 2026· Education sciences· Vol 16, pp. 1227· 0 citations· 57 references
TL;DR
Examining how accurately a common large language model assesses linguistic and content characteristics of texts written by first-grade students shows that LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics in early elementary school are not generally more accurate than LLM assessments of content text characteristics.
Abstract
The present study examines how accurately a common large language model (ChatGPT 5.0) assesses linguistic and content characteristics of texts written by first-grade students. The focus is on the consistency of LLM assessments and their alignment with human assessments. The database consists of N = 539 texts written by elementary school students. The results show that, contrary to our expectations, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics are not generally more consistent than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Furthermore, alignment between LLM and human assessments is higher for the assessment of single linguistic characteristics (such as the use of cohesive devices) than for the assessment of single content characteristics (such as originality), but not in general. Thus, LLM assessments of linguistic text characteristics in early elementary school are not generally more accurate than LLM assessments of content text characteristics. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for using LLMs as assessment tools in early stages of schooling.
This study examines the challenges faced by lecturers and item writers in selecting and creating texts for assessing reading comprehension in teaching Turkish as a foreign/second language. Conducted within the national e-YDTS four-skill Turkish proficiency test development project coordinated by the Measurement, Select...
Eser Kocaman Gürata, Nida Kırömeroğlu, Mustafa Durmuş· Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları...· 0 citations
It is suggested that evaluating LLM-based readability adaptation should combine objective measures with learner-centered feedback, rather than relying solely on conventional text difficulty.
Hatsune Ichidate, Yiling Dai, H. Ogata· 0 citations
How recognition accuracy varies across texts is analyzed and which characteristics make AI-generated physics texts more or less distinguishable from human-written ones are discussed, with implications for fostering AI literacy in physics education.
Péter Kosztyó, Márton Burkovics, Péter Jenei· Journal of Physics, Conferen...· 0 citations
Appropriate evaluation strategies are essential in teaching news text writing because not all students have the same ability to organize ideas, structure, and linguistic rules. This study aims to describe the evaluation strategies implemented by teachers on the news text writing skills of seventh-grade students at SMPI...
Sumayyah Azzahra, Asih Riyanti, Gita Minarti et al.· Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan cit...· 0 citations
Although LLM-based benchmark ratings can approximate expert judgments and reduce the need for labor-intensive human triple coding, limitations remain regarding cost, genre- and task specificity, and sensitivity to text presentation and student grade level—factors that constrain immediate classroom use, particularly for...
Introduction
. The results of the study on the development of critical interpretation skills regarding media texts among students at non-linguistic higher education institutions during foreign language instruction have been presented. The research problem stems from the fact that work with foreign media texts is oft...
I. A. Kashurina, S. Savela, N. Merkulova et al.· Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudars...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.