Skip to content

Hierarchical reinforcement learning with model predictive elevator control for risk-sensitive multi-robot transport scheduling in hospitals

Oct 2026 · Scientific Reports
Elevator Systems and Control

Abstract

Hospitals increasingly deploy autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) to move specimens and medicines between wards and laboratories. These fleets must meet clinical deadlines that differ across request classes, which couples two decisions: which request each robot serves, and the order of its stops. Intra-hospital transport is formulated here as a multi-objective Markov game and solved with hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning for transport (HMART). A shared graph-attention encoder feeds a sequential assignment decoder and a route-improvement decoder, a conditional value-at-risk constraint bounds the tail of class-weighted tardiness, and a model predictive control layer coordinates the capacitated elevators. Two instantiations are evaluated: HMART-H, whose decoders are engineered, and HMART-RL, whose assignment decoder is a trained attention network. In a discrete-event simulator of a four-floor hospital with three elevators, at heavy load with twelve robots over twenty paired seeds, HMART-H lowers mean total weighted tardiness from 2359 ± 214 to 29 ± 6 against the strongest dispatching rule, mean work-in-process from 80.1 ± 6.4 to 14.3 ± 1.9, and the ninety-fifth percentile tardiness tail by more than an order of magnitude, while raising the STAT on-time rate from 0.925 ± 0.011 to 0.969 ± 0.007; all differences are significant under Holm-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. HMART-RL reaches 40 ± 8 and transfers across fleet sizes and building configurations without retraining. These gains are obtained in simulation and require confirmation in a live building.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.