Skip to content
Review Open access

An evaluation of didactic oncology curriculum coverage in U.S. schools of pharmacy.

Sep 2026 · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · Vol 18 12, pp. 102804 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Although faculty-reported oncology curriculum coverage generally aligns with the 2019 ACCP Toolkit, potential gaps remain in select tier one topics and notable variability exists between programs.

Abstract

Objective

As oncology pharmacotherapy continues to expand in complexity and scope, characterization of oncology-related didactic instruction is needed. This study sought to determine the breadth and depth of oncology topics taught in U.S. schools of pharmacy using the 2019 American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Pharmacotherapy Didactic Curriculum Toolkit.

Methods

An 18-item survey instrument was electronically distributed to faculty involved in didactic oncology instruction across 139 U.S. schools of pharmacy. Data collected included the structure of the curriculum, the format and curricular hours for oncology topics, classroom pedagogical techniques, and general perceptions of the strengths and challenges of the didactic oncology curriculum.

Results

Survey responses were received from 80 of 139 schools (58%). Didactic oncology curricula comprised a median of 36 h, with most occurring during students' final didactic year. Most instruction focused on pharmacotherapy, followed by pharmacology and pathophysiology. Approximately 53% of programs teach all tier one topics from the 2019 ACCP Toolkit. Among these topics, nausea and vomiting were the most frequently taught, whereas fatigue was the least frequently taught. Commonly covered tier-two topics included solid tumors and supportive care. Tier three topics were infrequently covered. Didactic instruction was predominantly lecture-based, with patient cases the most common active-learning strategy.

Conclusion

Although faculty-reported oncology curriculum coverage generally aligns with the 2019 ACCP Toolkit, potential gaps remain in select tier one topics and notable variability exists between programs. These findings provide a contemporary description of oncology curriculum coverage and may inform ongoing curricular review and discussion across pharmacy programs.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Sep 2026

Inclusion of topics related to climate and health in U.S. Doctor of Pharmacy Didactic Curricula.

INTRODUCTION Among growing calls to incorporate topics related to climate change and health in U.S. Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curricula, a cross-sectional survey was developed and administered to collect baseline information for monitoring, comparison, and benchmarking. METHODS An electronic survey was sent to each...

Natalie A. Dipietro Mager, John N. Mager · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Developing a novel curriculum in medical cannabis for the supportive oncology context: Insights from palliative medicine program directors.

A scalable, evidence-informed curriculum focused on MC use in oncology patients is developed, with national deployment in process; ongoing evaluation, utilizing pre- and post-curricular surveys, will inform iterative refinement and broader dissemination.

Samantha Kumarasena, Pedro Luiz Lage Bodour Danielian, Peter Ceglowski et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

A Realist Evaluation of an Interprofessional Education Curriculum for Pharmacy.

A realist evaluation was an effective way of evaluating the collaborative competency development of UofT pharmacy graduates, particularly in the areas of prescribing disagreements and medical dominance.

Della Croteau, Heather Abela, Sylvia Langlois et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Summer Educational Program for Early Medical Student Exposure to Multidisciplinary Oncology: A Pilot Experience

Cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the United States, highlighting the need to strengthen the oncology workforce. Undergraduate medical education often lacks sufficient exposure to oncology, particularly radiation oncology, resulting in limited awareness of the specialty. Structured rotations in oncolo...

Melinda Gevorgian, L. Harrell, Gary D. Lewis et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Promoting equity, diversity and inclusion in health science education: Evaluation of a pharmacy curriculum.

OBJECTIVES Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) are increasingly recognised as important in health professions education; however, limited evidence exists regarding how EDI is represented across pharmacy teaching materials or perceived by learners. This study evaluated EDI representation within patient cases used acro...

Ayomide Ogundipe, Leanne Chalmers, Taryn Hutchison et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.