SkillHEX is introduced, a closed-loop framework coupling hypothesis-driven self-verification with evidence-guided tree search that translates falsifiable failure hypotheses into executable tests, producing diagnostic evidence as dense reward without additional environment attempts.
Abstract
Although agent skills equip LLMs with reusable procedural knowledge, manual maintenance suffers from high costs, unscalability, and misalignment. Real-world deployments thus require autonomous, on-demand skill evolution at test time, constrained by limited interaction budgets and a lack of training or validation sets. This setting introduces a severe sparse reward challenge, where outcomes conflate multiple latent failure causes. Under such ambiguity, existing methods that greedily refine a single incumbent skill are particularly vulnerable to an exploitation trap, allowing early misdiagnoses to exhaust limited trials along unproductive trajectories. To address this, we introduce SkillHEX, a closed-loop framework coupling hypothesis-driven self-verification with evidence-guided tree search. SkillHEX translates falsifiable failure hypotheses into executable tests, producing diagnostic evidence as dense reward without additional environment attempts. This evidence guides a search over persistent skill-revision branches, dynamically balancing the exploitation of supported edits with the exploration of plausible alternatives. Evaluated on 87 tasks from SkillsBench, SkillHEX outperforms existing self-evolving methods and achieves an average pass rate of 55.9% and 57.9% using GPT-5.3-Codex and Claude Opus 4.7 under a five-iteration budget, respectively.
SkillBoost is proposed, a three-stage framework that mitigates both risks: structured exploitation localizes observed failures to editable skill components, prior-guided exploration draws on prior knowledge in the LLM to generate diverse repair candidates, and verified acceptance commits a candidate only when it improv...
Hong-Qiang Lin, Chao Liu, Xiaofan Bai et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
SkillAdam, an Adam-inspired framework for optimizing discrete and non-differentiable skill documents, is introduced, an Adam-inspired framework for optimizing discrete and non-differentiable skill documents with substantially fewer optimization iterations and lower cost than prior methods.
Gao-Yuan Li, Mei-Hao Fan, Yi-Zhe Liu et al.· 3 citations· ⚡2
Self-Supervised Skill Optimization (SSO) is introduced, a comparative framework that learns a reusable skill from unlabeled task instances alone and outperforms existing GT-free prompt optimizers on both closed-ended and open-ended tasks.
Siran Peng, Cui-Yu Yang, Tianyu Fu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
SkillForge is proposed, a framework for continuous skill evolution that enables skills to be verified and refined through environment interaction and introduces evidence-based skill verification and multi-pathway skill induction, allowing the skill bank to continuously grow while maintaining its quality.
Shidong Yang, Zi-Yu Ma, Tongwen Huang et al.· 5 citations
This work introduces Skill Self-Play (Skill-SP), a co-evolutionary framework comprising a proposer, a solver, and a dynamic skill controller that effectively bridges the gap between structured verification and open-ended exploration.
Siyuan Huang, Pengyu Cheng, Haotian Liu et al.· arXiv.org· 2 citations
EviBack is presented, an evidence- constrained Teacher backoff that supplies auxiliary super- vision to such groups while preserving verifiable Actor re- wards, and separates evidence assessment from answer refine- ment, preventing reference answers from overriding evidence- insufficiency judgments.
Xiao Ma, Zhiquan Hu, Yi Wei et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.