Skip to content
Review Open access

Effectiveness of Multimodal Exercise and Technology-Assisted Interventions for Post-Stroke Motor Recovery : A Systematic Review

Oct 2026 · International journal of medical science and health research · 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke motor recovery remains a major rehabilitation challenge. Multimodal exercise and technology-assisted interventions are increasingly used, but their comparative efficacy and moderators of benefit remain unclear. Methods: This systematic review synthesized data from 80 sources (primarily RCTs, etc) examining multimodal exercise, technology-assisted, or combined interventions versus usual care or conventional rehabilitation in adult stroke patients. Outcomes included motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA), gait, balance, and activities of daily living (ADL). Results: In subacute stroke, exoskeleton-assisted anthropomorphic training produced superior FMA-UE gains (+4.51 points; 95% CI 1.13–7.90) [6]. Virtual reality (VR) exercise improved FMA-UE (SMD 0.45; 95% CI 0.21–0.68) [2], with doses >15 hours yielding greater gains (MD 9.67) [12]. Bihemispheric tDCS combined with physical/occupational therapy improved FMA by 20.7% vs. 3.2% [10]. High-volume constraint-induced movement therapy ranked second (SMD 0.86) [20]. In chronic stroke, brain-computer interface (BCI) with robotics produced significant FMA gains vs. standard therapy [9]. Telerehabilitation was noninferior to in-clinic therapy (FMA difference 0.06 points) [13]. For gait, end-effector robotic training improved velocity (MD 0.16 m/s) [14], and aerobic exercise improved 6MWT (p=0.011) [15] and gait velocity (0.21 vs. 0.06 m/s) [17]. Combined cardiorespiratory/resistance training improved walking speed (MD 0.09 m/s) [16]. FES plus motor relearning significantly improved Barthel Index (15.8 vs. 8.2) [37]. Discussion: Positive effects are most consistent in subacute stroke, with greater baseline impairment and active, volitional, high-dose practice. Technology often matches conventional therapy when intensity is equal, but adds value by enabling adherence, neurofeedback, or home delivery. Conclusion: Multimodal and technology-assisted interventions significantly improve post-stroke motor recovery, particularly in subacute patients and when providing high-repetition, volitional, or neurofeedback-driven training. Telerehabilitation and BCI systems offer promising scalable solutions.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.