A Multi-dimensional Evaluation-Verification Reward (EVR) decomposes evaluation into distinct visual criteria; for each criterion, an MLLM Evaluator generates multiple candidate hypotheses, and a Verifier grounds each claim in concrete visual evidence to accept or reject it, producing reliable and fine-grained reward signals.
Abstract
While recent image editing models have made rapid progress, multi-reference editing remains challenging, particularly in maintaining visual consistency across references and ensuring overall visual harmony. Reinforcement learning has proven highly effective for text-to-image generation and single-image editing, but its extension to multi-reference editing is hindered by the absence of suitable reward models that capture multi-image relational constraints. Moreover, naively using multimodal large language models(MLLMs) as zero-shot evaluators faces a key tension between hallucination-prone long-form reasoning and the limited deductive power of short-form judgments. We address these issues with a Multi-dimensional Evaluation-Verification Reward(EVR). EVR decomposes evaluation into distinct visual criteria; for each criterion, an MLLM Evaluator generates multiple candidate hypotheses, and a Verifier grounds each claim in concrete visual evidence to accept or reject it, producing reliable and fine-grained reward signals. Together with a scalable data pipeline, our method enables RL fine-tuning of off-the-shelf editors without architectural changes. Extensive experiments show substantial gains over the base Qwen-Image-Edit, improving consistency and harmony to match or surpass NanoBanana.
Lever-Edit is introduced, a two-stage framework that learns a reward-aligned captioner for counterfactual target descriptions, freezes it, and optimizes the editing policy solely with the transferred T2I reward, showing competitive editing alignment and source preservation against editing-reward-based fine-tuning, whil...
Qi-Chao Ma, Ji-Kang Cheng, Ling Liang et al.· 1 citation
The OmniEdit-Bench provides a comprehensive and reliable testbed for evaluating instruction-based video editing and offers insights into future research directions, including an accuracy-aware penalty mechanism that conditions other scores on accuracy, preventing visually plausible but incorrect edits from receiving in...
Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Yi Lu et al.· 1 citation
AVE-Agent is proposed, a modular agent framework that decomposes complex instructions into dependent subtasks and iteratively improves editing results through self-reflection and evaluator feedback, and improves instruction execution, Fidelity Preserving, and audio-visual alignment in joint editing while maintaining co...
RubricRM is proposed, a pairwise generative reward modeling framework that first produces an input-specific rubric with evaluation dimensions, weights, and scoring criteria, and then applies the rubric to score candidate images.
Zi-Jian Kan, Wei Wang, Long Luo et al.· 0 citations
A multi-dimensional image quality assessment framework for T2I tasks that can not only distinguish overall performance differences across models, but also provide interpretable results at the level of individual dimensions is proposed.
This work proposes InnoText, a unified DiT-based framework capable of performing both text generation and editing within a single model, and introduces a Font Size-Aware Modulation module to enhance representations across font scales, a Small-Character Aware Augmentation strategy to improve fine-grained fidelity, and a...
Hao-Wei Liu, Runze He, Jian Lu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.