This study examines the case of fine durum wheat by comparing Machine Learning and Deep Learning approaches under different feature configurations, with and without meteorological variables, and suggests that the predictive value of weather variables is highly dependent on data granularity and market structure.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of agricultural commodity prices is a critical task for market participants and policymakers, particularly in contexts characterized by multiple sources of uncertainty. Meteorological conditions are often considered potential drivers of price dynamics and are therefore frequently included in predictive models. This study examines the case of fine durum wheat by comparing Machine Learning and Deep Learning approaches under different feature configurations, with and without meteorological variables. Using long-term monthly data, we evaluate eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks within a unified out-of-sample forecasting framework. The empirical results show that, at the monthly frequency, including weather-related variables does not yield systematic improvements in forecasting accuracy. In several cases, models that exclude meteorological inputs achieve comparable or superior performance while reducing complexity. In particular, XGBoost trained on price-based covariates yields the most robust and accurate predictions, whereas LSTM models capture long-term trends but do not consistently benefit from climatic information. These findings highlight the importance of careful feature selection and suggest that the predictive value of weather variables is highly dependent on data granularity and market structure.
The findings demonstrate that rigorous leakage-free validation is essential for reliable forecasting research and that, for monthly Robusta coffee prices, increased model complexity does not necessarily yield superior predictive performance.
Dler H Kadir, D. Khalil, Azhin M. Khudhur· Forecasting· 0 citations
This study investigates the performance of four forecasting models—ARIMA, XGBoost, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Transformer)—for Apple Inc. (AAPL) stock price prediction using 20 years of historical daily data from Yahoo Finance.
Qian Cheng· Advances in Economics, Manag...· 0 citations
Light is shed on the effect of dissimilarity between train and test feature distributions on forecasting models, compares deep learning versus non-deep learning models, and introduces modifications that are effective for non-deep learning models.
This study evaluates the forecasting performance of classical econometric, deep learning, convolutional, and Transformer-based models for aluminum futures prices to demonstrate that parsimonious forecasting approaches can remain effective competitors to substantially more complex machine learning architectures in alumi...
László Vancsura, Tibor Tatay, Tibor Bareith et al.· Decision Making Advances· 0 citations
Price instability and fluctuations of basic commodities in East Java pose significant challenges that affect household purchasing power and complicate regional inflation control. This study aims to develop and evaluate a forecasting model for selected food commodity prices using a decomposition-based Hybrid ARIMA–LSTM...
Muhammad Zaki Nawwafi, H. Wahanani, Andreas Nugroho Sihananto· bit-Tech· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.