Resource-Oriented Prioritisation of Water-Supply Pipe Groups Using Repair and Service-Interruption Burdens

Abstract

Long utility records support renewal screening when failures, durations and exposure use consistent definitions. An audit covered 4885 water-supply failures in a major city in south-eastern Poland (2004–2025); 4859 had a valid repair duration and 4832 had a valid service-interruption status/duration. Events and annual exposure used the same diameter-based functional classification. Material was identified for 4824 events; 4806 events formed 14 material–function groups. The core CRITIC–TOPSIS model combined exposure-normalised failure rate, mean repair time and mean interruption time; 2000 event-level bootstrap replicates quantified sampling uncertainty. Network length increased by about 84.4%, while failure rate decreased (Spearman ρ = −0.911, p < 0.001). Mean repair and interruption times were 7.96 and 2.43 h; 64.2% of repairs equalled 8 h. Galvanised-steel service connections ranked first (CC = 0.819; P(rank 1) = 0.800; P(top 3) = 1.000), followed by steel and asbestos cement distribution pipes. Product-containing structures and the strict >8, >10 and >12 h threshold variants selected asbestos cement distribution pipes, whereas the inclusive ≥8 h and positive-only SIT variants retained galvanised-steel service connections. The result is a group-screening signal, not a renewal prescription; hydraulic consequence, customers affected, condition and cost remain necessary for segment decisions. Beyond the case study, the workflow provides a transferable, low-data screening approach for directing limited maintenance and renewal resources while accounting for water-service accessibility; numerical priorities should be recalculated using local exposure, operational conditions and decision thresholds.